Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
There is not a single statistic that says that women lawyers have achieved equality in terms of pay, position, power, or prestige ' not one. From its roots in 1987 as the brainchild of ABA President Robert MacCrate and its first chair, Hillary Rodham Clinton, the ABA Commission on Women in the Profession has worked to assess the status of women lawyers and support efforts to help them achieve full and equal participation and opportunities in the legal profession. The Commission's lodestar has been that organized and concerted efforts could make a difference in combating the causes and effects of gender bias, stereotypes, harassment, and inhospitable work environments that have impeded the professional careers and aspirations of women in the bar.
The Commission has undertaken these efforts over the years against a backdrop of continuing gender discrimination in many aspects of society and business. Women still earn, on average, only 72 cents for every dollar a man earns, and a man with a college degree will make an average of $15,000 more per year than a similarly situated woman. Many opportunities in sports, the professions, and other industries are still unreachable for women, regardless of their talent or potential. The pace of progress in too many fields has been glacial.
Nevertheless, the Commission's work product over the past 16 years is nothing short of staggering. For example, the Commission has:
Last year, we started a research project examining the experiences of women of color, a group clustered at the lowest rungs in every segment of the bar. This project will be unprecedented in its scope and impact. Another current initiative is an oral history aimed at illuminating the stories of women trailblazers in their respective states. Additionally, because we see that leadership is the driver to effect meaningful change, Commission members have targeted leadership issues, both on the individual and institutional levels.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?