Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Joel Rose authored last month's A&FP article on how to balance compensation for law firm partners whose strengths lay in origination, production and management. So A&FP sought his reaction to the following thought-provoking quote from Peter C. Lando and Matthew B. Lowrie.
The quote is from a recent article Lando and Lowrie coauthored for the National Law Journal. Their article addresses the question: Can a firm wanting its attorneys to have a better work-family balance survive and flourish if it requires only 1600 billable hours/yr per lawyer?
The quote (emphasis added): “Maintaining balance and a fair return for the work requires teamwork. This is necessary so that an undue burden is not placed on any one person. If the vision is not shared, then internally competitive behavior can distract from both the personal and financial rewards of practice. It helps toward that end not to track originations or billing credit.”
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?