Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
On March 16, 2004, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued final rules amending Form 8-K to increase significantly the number of events that trigger the requirement to file and shorten the deadline for filing (17 CFR 228, 229, 230, 239, 240 and 249. See, SEC Release nos. 33-8400; 34-49424. A copy of the Release can be obtained from the SEC's Web site at http://www.sec.gov/). The new rules became effective on Aug. 23, 2004 and significantly expand the filing and disclosure requirements applicable to public companies with respect to mergers and acquisitions and other material transactions. The rules are another in a long series of measures adopted by the SEC pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and are intended to improve the dissemination of information regarding public companies to investors in a timely manner.
As many readers are aware, in addition to quarterly and annual reports, public companies are required to file “current” reports on Form 8-K disclosing the occurrence of certain material events. Historically, the filing of a Form 8-K was required upon the occurrence of a relatively short list of events (eg, a change in control, the acquisition or disposition of significant assets, bankruptcy, etc.). In addition, a so-called “Item 5″ Form 8-K could be filed voluntarily to report any other matter deemed important to security holders by the issuer. Transactions typically implicated Form 8-K in one of several ways. For example, an acquisition or disposition which met the relevant size test would require a filing pursuant to Item 2 of the pre-amended Form 8-K within 15 days after closing of the transaction. In addition, while not technically required, most public companies generally filed an Item 5 8-K upon entering into an agreement with respect to a material transaction.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?