Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Law firms were late adopters of information technology. In 1990, when clients were providing all employees with standalone personal computers running DOS and Lotus 1-2-3, law firms were still buying Wang terminals for secretaries and dictation equipment for lawyers ' and many lawyers never expected to touch a keyboard.
Differentiating a firm with technology was easy in those days: The firm simply had to have technology.
Of course, there's little evidence that clients cared much about their firms' technology in those days. In contrast, some clients today will base their choice of law firms in part on the firms' technology. Clients want to know about a firm's technology for reusing and sharing work product (and other information under the general rubric of “knowledge management”). Clients want to know that they can access task, contact and other information through a firm's extranet. And clients want to know that their firms are generally capable of providing the technology that clients need to receive efficient and capable legal services.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Chief information officers still bear the brunt of cybersecurity worries at many companies. But a study by the Association of Corporate Counsel Foundation finds that chief legal officers are increasingly taking a leadership role in cybersecurity strategy.
General counsel are eager to tap the promise of generative AI. But without clear technology road maps, many legal departments are struggling to turn that interest into action.
Part Two of this two-part article examines practical steps marketers must take to succeed in this changing landscape by embracing a multichannel, AI-driven approach to their marketing and PR efforts.
When the SEC issues the next annual enforcement report for fiscal year 2025, we expect securities offering actions and investment adviser actions will almost certainly be up, and the “crypto” and “cyber” cases will almost certainly be down. Public statements by the new SEC administration have said as much, but even more telling than public statements are the allocation of limited enforcement resources.
The VPPA may be nearly four-decades old and video-rental stores largely a thing of the past, but the rise of online content, streaming services and ancillary activities has brought with it frequent litigation based on the VPPA. The key challenge in these litigations is how to interpret the VPPA’s 1980s terms in light of today’s digital advances.