Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

$10K Raises For Philadelphia Associates

By Jeff Blumenthal
December 27, 2004

Three more Philadelphia law firms have joined in the parade to raise starting salaries. Hangley Aronchick Segal & Pudlin and Saul Ewing both moved their starting wage from $105,000 to $115,000, and Fox Rothschild is jacking its rate from $100,000 to $110,000.

Six other firms ' Ballard Spahr Andrews & Ingersoll, Blank Rome, Duane Morris, Pepper Hamilton, Reed Smith and Wolf, Block, Schorr and Solis-Cohen ' raised their salaries to $115,00 earlier this fall while Cozen O'Connor moved up to $110,000. Dechert and Morgan, Lewis & Bockius had already established a starting salary of $125,000 2 years ago while Drinker Biddle & Reath moved to $115,000 soon after.

Hangley Aronchick managing partner David Pudlin said the decision was made so that the firm could be competitive in the entry-level recruiting process. But he added that all of the firm's associates will receive $10,000 raises.

Saul Ewing Chairman Stephen Aichele says the market shift also precipitated the increase at his firm. Like Hangley Aronchick, all Saul Ewing associates will receive $10,000 raises. “It's been a while but the marketplace has changed and we can't afford to be left behind,” Aichele says. “This is not only for recruiting but also to keep our existing associates.”

Fox Rothschild managing partner Abraham Reich said the move to $110,000 will keep the firm competitive with its large-firm brethren. He said while there will be some ripple effect on the firm's more experienced associates; not all of them will receive $10,000 raises. He did say the firm will focus on its merit-based bonus program to supplement base salary.

Wolf Block's previously announced plan is similar: lockstep raises for second- and third-year associates vs. merit-based salary and bonus increases for those in their fourth year and above. According to Phil Garber, Wolf Block's human resources partner, there is no exact formula for the merit-based raises, but it will include quality of work, the amount of billable hours, pro bono efforts and firm citizenship. Wolf Block plans to pay for the raises through a combination of billing rate adjustments, partner profits or having associates bill more hours.



Jeff Blumenthal The Legal Intelligencer A&FP

Three more Philadelphia law firms have joined in the parade to raise starting salaries. Hangley Aronchick Segal & Pudlin and Saul Ewing both moved their starting wage from $105,000 to $115,000, and Fox Rothschild is jacking its rate from $100,000 to $110,000.

Six other firms ' Ballard Spahr Andrews & Ingersoll, Blank Rome, Duane Morris, Pepper Hamilton, Reed Smith and Wolf, Block, Schorr and Solis-Cohen ' raised their salaries to $115,00 earlier this fall while Cozen O'Connor moved up to $110,000. Dechert and Morgan, Lewis & Bockius had already established a starting salary of $125,000 2 years ago while Drinker Biddle & Reath moved to $115,000 soon after.

Hangley Aronchick managing partner David Pudlin said the decision was made so that the firm could be competitive in the entry-level recruiting process. But he added that all of the firm's associates will receive $10,000 raises.

Saul Ewing Chairman Stephen Aichele says the market shift also precipitated the increase at his firm. Like Hangley Aronchick, all Saul Ewing associates will receive $10,000 raises. “It's been a while but the marketplace has changed and we can't afford to be left behind,” Aichele says. “This is not only for recruiting but also to keep our existing associates.”

Fox Rothschild managing partner Abraham Reich said the move to $110,000 will keep the firm competitive with its large-firm brethren. He said while there will be some ripple effect on the firm's more experienced associates; not all of them will receive $10,000 raises. He did say the firm will focus on its merit-based bonus program to supplement base salary.

Wolf Block's previously announced plan is similar: lockstep raises for second- and third-year associates vs. merit-based salary and bonus increases for those in their fourth year and above. According to Phil Garber, Wolf Block's human resources partner, there is no exact formula for the merit-based raises, but it will include quality of work, the amount of billable hours, pro bono efforts and firm citizenship. Wolf Block plans to pay for the raises through a combination of billing rate adjustments, partner profits or having associates bill more hours.



Jeff Blumenthal The Legal Intelligencer A&FP

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

'Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P.': A Tutorial On Contract Liability for Real Estate Purchasers Image

In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.

Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.