Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Enhancing Your Firm's Web Presence

By Jose Rosa
December 27, 2004

Your law firm's Web site design has remained static for years. While it may be functional, it's not generating the traffic you originally envisioned, it's not interactive and the overall design is looking a tad dated. You may also not have anyone in-house who can devote the requisite time and effort needed to make the firm's site a productive new business and practice development 24/7/365 marketing tool.

Many law firms still don't understand that a poorly designed Web site can damage the firm's credibility and impair its image. So what's the solution? Seek the services of a Web-crafting firm that will not just be a vendor, but a Web partner and architectural strategist. The Web-crafting firm should first ask senior law firm executives to complete a detailed questionnaire or profile that encompasses these basic elements:

  • Company goals/objectives;
  • How this translates to the firm's Web site, eg, is one goal to provide a service to the firm's existing clients, and if so, how will they learn about the Web site?;
  • What makes your firm's services unique?;
  • How will you measure the success of your site?;
  • Budget and timeline specifications;
  • Details of the firm's existing branding and marketing strategy;
  • Target audience(s);
  • Analysis of your competitors' sites;
  • What services/information will you make available on the site?;
  • How will prospective clients learn about the site?;
  • What will make them decide to visit it initially?;
  • How will you convince them to return to the site?; and
  • Who can they contact for assistance?

After the profile has been completed, the Web-crafting partner will be able to define your firm's immediate goals and present an effective Web site strategy and design. This will also include setting a realistic budget because there are a number of 'back-end' considerations to take into consideration:

  • A purely informational static site with pictures and text is a lot cheaper than a site with dynamic applications such as a client area for secure communications;
  • Two sites may appear identical, but without knowing what has been built on the back-end, it's impossible to identify how much either site cost; and
  • Two sites, identical in function, may have different databases that were selected depending on how many visitors use the site hourly, daily, monthly, etc., the number of servers and how the site is served (eg, is it dedicated or virtual).

Your Web-crafting partner's proposal should include three physical 'deliverables':

  • Specs. These provide a solid report of the decisions that have been made and what will go into your site;
  • Flow Chart. These detail the main sections. In short, it's a sketch that will evolve during the Web site's design/construction; and
  • Schematic Drawing. This outlines how many sections there will be and shows the physical layout of the interface template.

Hopefully, your Web-crafting firm will custom design your Web site, building scripts for newsletters, menu rollovers, and more. Whoever owns the source code for these elements could potentially use it to build other Web sites. While you should reserve the right to access your source code without making subsequent use of it, the legal owner of the source code should be the Web-crafting firm who developed it.

A simple analogy ' while you are the owner of your custom-built house, the architect still has intellectual property rights to the blueprints for the house, preventing anyone else from claiming them as their own and making a profit from them. The same is true for the difference between the source code used to build your law firm's Web site and the actual site itself.

These issues are relevant both to your Web-crafting partner and to the law firm. Ensuring that your production contract specifies ownership of the source code belongs to the Web-crafting partner will actually save you money. If, on the other hand, you request that you own all documents or source files related to a project, then you will be billed for all such work.

This means that if the Web-crafting partner builds a logo for you, drafting several versions of it until one is created to your liking, you will own all versions but will also be billed for the work and time put into all of these versions. This is in contrast to paying solely for the time and work put into what you will ultimately use ' the one final logo.

Because many law firms still consider conventional advertising to be inappropriate and/or unprofessional, your Web site, if properly constructed and optimized for search engines, can serve as an excellent informational and marketing tool since it's non-intrusive. Your Web-crafting partner can work with you in helping to enhance your firm's Web presence and make sure that you're easily found.



Jose Rosa [email protected]

Your law firm's Web site design has remained static for years. While it may be functional, it's not generating the traffic you originally envisioned, it's not interactive and the overall design is looking a tad dated. You may also not have anyone in-house who can devote the requisite time and effort needed to make the firm's site a productive new business and practice development 24/7/365 marketing tool.

Many law firms still don't understand that a poorly designed Web site can damage the firm's credibility and impair its image. So what's the solution? Seek the services of a Web-crafting firm that will not just be a vendor, but a Web partner and architectural strategist. The Web-crafting firm should first ask senior law firm executives to complete a detailed questionnaire or profile that encompasses these basic elements:

  • Company goals/objectives;
  • How this translates to the firm's Web site, eg, is one goal to provide a service to the firm's existing clients, and if so, how will they learn about the Web site?;
  • What makes your firm's services unique?;
  • How will you measure the success of your site?;
  • Budget and timeline specifications;
  • Details of the firm's existing branding and marketing strategy;
  • Target audience(s);
  • Analysis of your competitors' sites;
  • What services/information will you make available on the site?;
  • How will prospective clients learn about the site?;
  • What will make them decide to visit it initially?;
  • How will you convince them to return to the site?; and
  • Who can they contact for assistance?

After the profile has been completed, the Web-crafting partner will be able to define your firm's immediate goals and present an effective Web site strategy and design. This will also include setting a realistic budget because there are a number of 'back-end' considerations to take into consideration:

  • A purely informational static site with pictures and text is a lot cheaper than a site with dynamic applications such as a client area for secure communications;
  • Two sites may appear identical, but without knowing what has been built on the back-end, it's impossible to identify how much either site cost; and
  • Two sites, identical in function, may have different databases that were selected depending on how many visitors use the site hourly, daily, monthly, etc., the number of servers and how the site is served (eg, is it dedicated or virtual).

Your Web-crafting partner's proposal should include three physical 'deliverables':

  • Specs. These provide a solid report of the decisions that have been made and what will go into your site;
  • Flow Chart. These detail the main sections. In short, it's a sketch that will evolve during the Web site's design/construction; and
  • Schematic Drawing. This outlines how many sections there will be and shows the physical layout of the interface template.

Hopefully, your Web-crafting firm will custom design your Web site, building scripts for newsletters, menu rollovers, and more. Whoever owns the source code for these elements could potentially use it to build other Web sites. While you should reserve the right to access your source code without making subsequent use of it, the legal owner of the source code should be the Web-crafting firm who developed it.

A simple analogy ' while you are the owner of your custom-built house, the architect still has intellectual property rights to the blueprints for the house, preventing anyone else from claiming them as their own and making a profit from them. The same is true for the difference between the source code used to build your law firm's Web site and the actual site itself.

These issues are relevant both to your Web-crafting partner and to the law firm. Ensuring that your production contract specifies ownership of the source code belongs to the Web-crafting partner will actually save you money. If, on the other hand, you request that you own all documents or source files related to a project, then you will be billed for all such work.

This means that if the Web-crafting partner builds a logo for you, drafting several versions of it until one is created to your liking, you will own all versions but will also be billed for the work and time put into all of these versions. This is in contrast to paying solely for the time and work put into what you will ultimately use ' the one final logo.

Because many law firms still consider conventional advertising to be inappropriate and/or unprofessional, your Web site, if properly constructed and optimized for search engines, can serve as an excellent informational and marketing tool since it's non-intrusive. Your Web-crafting partner can work with you in helping to enhance your firm's Web presence and make sure that you're easily found.



Jose Rosa Multimedia, Inc. [email protected]

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

'Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P.': A Tutorial On Contract Liability for Real Estate Purchasers Image

In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.

Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.