Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
One of the most important provisions of the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 establishes a new regime for taxing deferred compensation. Newly created Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code likely will affect every arrangement now in place or hereafter adopted that promises the payment of deferred compensation to current and former employees, directors and other service providers. Such an arrangement may well include a partnership's unfunded retirement program for its partners.
With designated exceptions ' a tax-qualified retirement plan or a bona fide vacation leave, sick leave, compensatory time, disability pay or death benefit plan ' Section 409A requires that, in order to avoid adverse tax consequences, all compensation deferred under any plan or arrangement must meet several strict requirements, listed below. Deferred payments that fail to meet the new requirements will become fully taxable, and will also be subject to an extra 20% tax and interest, in the taxable year the amount vests.
Requirements to Avoid Taxation and Penalty
The four requirements a plan must meet to satisfy Section 409A are as follows:
Applicability to Partnerships
While Section 409A itself is silent on the subject, guidance issued by the Treasury on December 20, 2004 (Notice 2005-1) (revised 1/2005) confirms that Section 409A will apply to any arrangement between a partner and a partnership that provides for the deferral of compensation under a non-qualified deferred compensation plan.
For example, Notice 2005-1 makes clear that an arrangement providing for retirement payments to a partner that are described in Section 1402(a)(10) of the Code will be subject to the new rules. Section 1402(a)(10) describes partnership payments that are eligible to be excluded from self-employment income of a retired partner. These are payments received pursuant to a written plan that provides for periodic payments to partners (or to a class or classes of partners) on account of retirement, with the payments to continue at least until the partner's death, where:
Notice 2005-1 points out that Section 409A may also apply to payments covered by Section 707(a)(1) (payments to a partner not acting in his or her capacity as a partner), if the payments otherwise would constitute a deferral of compensation under a non-qualified deferred compensation plan. It excepts from Section 409A's rules, at least until further guidance is issued, payments from a partnership subject to Section 736 of the Code (other than payments described in Section 1402(a)(10), as noted above).
Effective Date and Limited Safe Harbor
These provisions of the new law apply generally to amounts deferred after Dec. 31, 2004. Amounts earned and vested prior to 2005 will not be subject to the new rules, unless the plan under which they are deferred, eg, a partnership agreement, is materially modified after Oct. 3, 2004, other than in conformity with anticipated IRS guidance.
For partners not vested in their retirement payouts prior to Jan. 1, 2005, Notice 2005-1 provides limited relief. It allows them an opportunity to avoid the adverse tax consequences of the new provision if the agreement under which they are entitled to receive their retirement payments is amended on or before Dec. 31, 2005 to provide for election and payment provisions that comply with the requirements outlined above. In the meanwhile, their agreement will not be treated as violating Section 409A so long as the agreement is operated in good faith compliance with the provisions of Section 409A and Notice 2005-1 during calendar year 2005 until the agreement is amended.
One of the most important provisions of the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 establishes a new regime for taxing deferred compensation. Newly created Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code likely will affect every arrangement now in place or hereafter adopted that promises the payment of deferred compensation to current and former employees, directors and other service providers. Such an arrangement may well include a partnership's unfunded retirement program for its partners.
With designated exceptions ' a tax-qualified retirement plan or a bona fide vacation leave, sick leave, compensatory time, disability pay or death benefit plan ' Section 409A requires that, in order to avoid adverse tax consequences, all compensation deferred under any plan or arrangement must meet several strict requirements, listed below. Deferred payments that fail to meet the new requirements will become fully taxable, and will also be subject to an extra 20% tax and interest, in the taxable year the amount vests.
Requirements to Avoid Taxation and Penalty
The four requirements a plan must meet to satisfy Section 409A are as follows:
Applicability to Partnerships
While Section 409A itself is silent on the subject, guidance issued by the Treasury on December 20, 2004 (Notice 2005-1) (revised 1/2005) confirms that Section 409A will apply to any arrangement between a partner and a partnership that provides for the deferral of compensation under a non-qualified deferred compensation plan.
For example, Notice 2005-1 makes clear that an arrangement providing for retirement payments to a partner that are described in Section 1402(a)(10) of the Code will be subject to the new rules. Section 1402(a)(10) describes partnership payments that are eligible to be excluded from self-employment income of a retired partner. These are payments received pursuant to a written plan that provides for periodic payments to partners (or to a class or classes of partners) on account of retirement, with the payments to continue at least until the partner's death, where:
Notice 2005-1 points out that Section 409A may also apply to payments covered by Section 707(a)(1) (payments to a partner not acting in his or her capacity as a partner), if the payments otherwise would constitute a deferral of compensation under a non-qualified deferred compensation plan. It excepts from Section 409A's rules, at least until further guidance is issued, payments from a partnership subject to Section 736 of the Code (other than payments described in Section 1402(a)(10), as noted above).
Effective Date and Limited Safe Harbor
These provisions of the new law apply generally to amounts deferred after Dec. 31, 2004. Amounts earned and vested prior to 2005 will not be subject to the new rules, unless the plan under which they are deferred, eg, a partnership agreement, is materially modified after Oct. 3, 2004, other than in conformity with anticipated IRS guidance.
For partners not vested in their retirement payouts prior to Jan. 1, 2005, Notice 2005-1 provides limited relief. It allows them an opportunity to avoid the adverse tax consequences of the new provision if the agreement under which they are entitled to receive their retirement payments is amended on or before Dec. 31, 2005 to provide for election and payment provisions that comply with the requirements outlined above. In the meanwhile, their agreement will not be treated as violating Section 409A so long as the agreement is operated in good faith compliance with the provisions of Section 409A and Notice 2005-1 during calendar year 2005 until the agreement is amended.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Businesses have long embraced the use of computer technology in the workplace as a means of improving efficiency and productivity of their operations. In recent years, businesses have incorporated artificial intelligence and other automated and algorithmic technologies into their computer systems. This article provides an overview of the federal regulatory guidance and the state and local rules in place so far and suggests ways in which employers may wish to address these developments with policies and practices to reduce legal risk.
This two-part article dives into the massive shifts AI is bringing to Google Search and SEO and why traditional searches are no longer part of the solution for marketers. It’s not theoretical, it’s happening, and firms that adapt will come out ahead.
For decades, the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act has been the only law to expressly address privacy for minors’ information other than student data. In the absence of more robust federal requirements, states are stepping in to regulate not only the processing of all minors’ data, but also online platforms used by teens and children.
In an era where the workplace is constantly evolving, law firms face unique challenges and opportunities in facilities management, real estate, and design. Across the industry, firms are reevaluating their office spaces to adapt to hybrid work models, prioritize collaboration, and enhance employee experience. Trends such as flexible seating, technology-driven planning, and the creation of multifunctional spaces are shaping the future of law firm offices.
Protection against unauthorized model distillation is an emerging issue within the longstanding theme of safeguarding intellectual property. This article examines the legal protections available under the current legal framework and explore why patents may serve as a crucial safeguard against unauthorized distillation.