Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Has Anything Been Learned About Crisis Media?

By Jay M. Jaffe
March 30, 2005

I Should Have Known Better…

(Beatles song title, written by John Lennon and Paul McCartney and released on the Hard Day's Night album in 1964)

One would think, after all this time has passed, that everyone in the world would know how to better handle a media crisis. I mean, just look at the examples of best, and worst, practices:

  • The Tylenol drug tampering scandal of 1982. Tylenol, the then leading U.S. pain-killing medicine, faced a catastrophic crisis when seven people in Chicago were reported dead after taking extra-strength Tylenol capsules. It was reported that an unknown suspect put 65 milligrams of deadly cyanide into Tylenol capsules, 10,000 times more than what is necessary to kill a human. Tylenol was generally credited with dealing with the problem in a textbook-like manner and was applauded for taking the necessary proactive steps to do the right thing and save the product.
  • The Watergate Scandal of 1972-1974. President Richard Nixon was faced with the problem of candidly exposing his culpability as well as the machinations of his immediate staff in efforts to cover up what many called a second-rate burglary of the offices of the Democratic National Committee. Or, participating in an attempted cover-up that eventually led to his having to resign the presidency in disgrace. Nixon is generally credited by PR professionals as having botched an opportunity by underestimating the compassion of the American people and their ability to forgive and forget.
  • The Monica Lewinsky Scandal. President Clinton said it all: “I did not have sex with that woman.” Whoops … how do you define sex? Does oral sex not count? And it went downhill from there. If there was ever a charmer in the White House who could have pulled off a mea culpa it was Bill Clinton. But, he also chose to take the low road that is often the road less travelled in political and business scandals.

There were more, the Bhopal tragedy in India. Bhopal is the site of probably the greatest industrial disaster in history. Between 1977 and 1984, Union Carbide India Limited (UCIL), located within a crowded working class neighborhood in Bhopal, was licensed to manufacture potentially dangerous chemicals. On the night of Dec. 2, 1984 an accident caused toxic vapors to escape from the plant into the surrounding areas. There was no warning for people surrounding the plant as the emergency sirens had been switched off. The effect on the people living in the shanty settlements just over the fence was immediate and devastating. Many died in their beds, others staggered from their homes, blinded and choking, to die in the street. Many more died later after reaching hospitals and emergency aid centers. It is been estimated that at least 3000 people died as a result of this accident, while figures for the number of people injured currently range from 200,000 to 600,000. The factory was closed down after the accident. But, more importantly it was a public relations disaster for Union Carbide as the days and weeks following exhibited to the world a case study of the lack of corporate sympathy and further management attempts to divert the blame.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Legal Possession: What Does It Mean? Image

Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.

The Anti-Assignment Override Provisions Image

UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?