Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Note from the Editor

By Elizabeth Anne
April 29, 2005

We have some exciting things going on at Marketing The Law Firm. First of all, and you may have noticed this last month, we have expanded each issue to 12 pages which gives all of our readers more content. It also gives budding and authors an opportunity to take pen to paper or fingers to keyboard and write an article for MLF. We also would like to have those of you who have already contributed articles to think about some new topics and let us hear from you. On the format side, we will be absorbing all of our supplements into this new 12-page format including “Sales in the Law Firm.” Our Best of Competitions are being rolled into the MLF 50. The only exception will be Best of Law Firm Leaders in Marketing that will be published in our September issue. This is not a competition but will be an objective look at law firm leaders who genuinely understand the value of marketing and are committed to marketing by personally and professionally supporting efforts of the CMO or Director. I will be handling all of the interviews for that issue so if you are interested in having the leader of your firm interviewed for this issue, do let me know. Last year we featured seven firm leaders that really make a difference in the lives of law firm marketing professionals. I look forward to receiving your thoughts and input on who should make our list this year.

This month we're very excited about the announcement of the MLF 50. The Advisory Board, which was hand picked based on their experience in professional services marketing and communications, have worked very hard on adapting criteria for this listing and are taking their charge very seriously. The criteria is very comprehensive and while the firms that cover as many aspects of the criteria will have a better positioning on the list, those firms that stand out in one or more of the criteria will be recognized accordingly. This listing is being created with a great deal of thought and attention to detail and content. My only advice to entrants is to really think through the criteria and what you want your firm to convey in those areas. We all look forward to receiving entries from a myriad of law firms. As indicated, the MLF 50 will be published in a special July/August issue.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Why So Many Great Lawyers Stink at Business Development and What Law Firms Are Doing About It Image

Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?

Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.

The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

A Lawyer's System for Active Reading Image

Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.

Protecting Innovation in the Cyber World from Patent Trolls Image

With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.