Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Ed Wesemann's book Creating Dominance provides an impressively coherent guide to strategic thinking for law firm planners. The book draws on Wesemann's extensive experience in law firm consulting as well as insights from business-management theorists ' notably Peter Drucker, pricing theorists Thomas Nagle and Reed Holdern, Hardball authors George Stalk and Rob Lachenauer, and merger scorecard explicators Robert Kaplan and David Norton.
The book's opening chapter, excerpted in this issue in full except for graphics, explains why law firms should seek to dominate their market niches. Subsequent chapters offer a wealth of how-to ideas for improving and leveraging a law firm's market share through five different approaches:
As Wesemann explains, these strategies have many interdependencies, and many of them depend heavily on timing. For example, the requirements for gaining industry dominance differ depending on whether the industry itself is in an emerging, growth or mature stage.
Considering its brevity, the book is remarkably comprehensive. In the chapter on pricing strategies, for example, Wesemann assesses five billing “philosophies,” three basic pricing methods, four basic client positions on pricing, ten sets of criteria for assessing price sensitivity, and five different pricing strategies.
Of particular interest to A&FP readers will be cost-benefit considerations of the various strategies. For example, geographic dominance strategies can entail heavy investments in new offices, while practice dominance strategies can require large investments in lateral acquisitions. By comparison, industry-focus dominance can often be attained much less expensively. Wesemann considers industry dominance a significantly underused strategy, in part because its attainment permits relatively easy horizontal and vertical expansion of dominance into related industries (eg, to industries that supply the original focal industry).
Wesemann concludes the book with a chapter on “Implementing Strategy,” in which he illustrates how a bold strategic plan can bring well-chosen strategic aims to fruition.
Creating Dominance: Winning Strategies for Law Firms is available from the publisher at 800-839-8640 (or search for Wesemann at www.authorhouse.com/bookstore). The publisher also has Wesemann's 2004 book, The First Great Myth of Legal Management is that it Exists, which was reviewed in A&FP's February 2005 edition.
' Joe Danowsky, Editor-in-Chief
Ed Wesemann's book Creating Dominance provides an impressively coherent guide to strategic thinking for law firm planners. The book draws on Wesemann's extensive experience in law firm consulting as well as insights from business-management theorists ' notably Peter Drucker, pricing theorists Thomas Nagle and Reed Holdern, Hardball authors George Stalk and Rob Lachenauer, and merger scorecard explicators Robert Kaplan and David Norton.
The book's opening chapter, excerpted in this issue in full except for graphics, explains why law firms should seek to dominate their market niches. Subsequent chapters offer a wealth of how-to ideas for improving and leveraging a law firm's market share through five different approaches:
As Wesemann explains, these strategies have many interdependencies, and many of them depend heavily on timing. For example, the requirements for gaining industry dominance differ depending on whether the industry itself is in an emerging, growth or mature stage.
Considering its brevity, the book is remarkably comprehensive. In the chapter on pricing strategies, for example, Wesemann assesses five billing “philosophies,” three basic pricing methods, four basic client positions on pricing, ten sets of criteria for assessing price sensitivity, and five different pricing strategies.
Of particular interest to A&FP readers will be cost-benefit considerations of the various strategies. For example, geographic dominance strategies can entail heavy investments in new offices, while practice dominance strategies can require large investments in lateral acquisitions. By comparison, industry-focus dominance can often be attained much less expensively. Wesemann considers industry dominance a significantly underused strategy, in part because its attainment permits relatively easy horizontal and vertical expansion of dominance into related industries (eg, to industries that supply the original focal industry).
Wesemann concludes the book with a chapter on “Implementing Strategy,” in which he illustrates how a bold strategic plan can bring well-chosen strategic aims to fruition.
Creating Dominance: Winning Strategies for Law Firms is available from the publisher at 800-839-8640 (or search for Wesemann at www.authorhouse.com/bookstore). The publisher also has Wesemann's 2004 book, The First Great Myth of Legal Management is that it Exists, which was reviewed in A&FP's February 2005 edition.
' Joe Danowsky, Editor-in-Chief
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.