Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
[Editor's Note: I'd like to hear readers' thoughts on the following news article excerpt. Please e-mail your remarks to [email protected].]
For almost a year, lawyers from eight of the largest corporations in the country have been meeting and exchanging information. The group, which first came together last fall, includes in-house attorneys from Cisco Systems Inc., E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Co., FMC Technologies Inc., General Motors Corp. and Microsoft Corp. Together they oversee a collective annual legal budget exceeding $1 billion.
According to Thomas Sager, associate general counsel at DuPont, the coalition is “an attempt to level the playing field.” Pointing to the size of recent law firm mergers, he says: “The bigger they get, the more insensitive they might become to clients' needs.” Microsoft deputy GC Kevin Harrang adds that corporate counsel are facing more pressure at their companies to keep costs down.
Sager says that he and his fellow coalition members have “been trying to foment change for the last ten to 12 years. We realized about a year ago that if we act more collectively, we can leverage our experience to drive increased efficiency.”
Cisco GC Mark Chandler stresses that the group isn't just focused on getting lower fees. “We're trying to get firms to think about providing services more efficiently,” he says. As part of the group's effort, Sager traveled to India in March to research outsourcing opportunities for legal work.
The group is also talking about banding together to make collective purchases of legal services. In May, the coalition took its first step toward a collective purchase when it invited roughly 20 law firms, plus some other companies, to bid to create an online system that human resources departments could use to get automated answers to routine questions.
[Editor's Note: I'd like to hear readers' thoughts on the following news article excerpt. Please e-mail your remarks to [email protected].]
For almost a year, lawyers from eight of the largest corporations in the country have been meeting and exchanging information. The group, which first came together last fall, includes in-house attorneys from
According to Thomas Sager, associate general counsel at DuPont, the coalition is “an attempt to level the playing field.” Pointing to the size of recent law firm mergers, he says: “The bigger they get, the more insensitive they might become to clients' needs.”
Sager says that he and his fellow coalition members have “been trying to foment change for the last ten to 12 years. We realized about a year ago that if we act more collectively, we can leverage our experience to drive increased efficiency.”
Cisco GC Mark Chandler stresses that the group isn't just focused on getting lower fees. “We're trying to get firms to think about providing services more efficiently,” he says. As part of the group's effort, Sager traveled to India in March to research outsourcing opportunities for legal work.
The group is also talking about banding together to make collective purchases of legal services. In May, the coalition took its first step toward a collective purchase when it invited roughly 20 law firms, plus some other companies, to bid to create an online system that human resources departments could use to get automated answers to routine questions.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.