Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
[Editor's Note: I've appreciated the cooperation and restraint of all authors in not dwelling on the sales points for their particular Business Intelligence products. To avoid excessive abstraction, however, I felt that one article in this special edition should help us ground our considerations by providing a little more product detail.]
Case Study:
Improving the Bottom Line Down Under
An example of a law firm currently aligning its budgeting process with its BI strategy is Clayton Utz, an early adopter of the recently introduced version 7.0 of ADERANT Budgeting. Australia's third largest law firm, Clayton Utz has 207 partners and more than 1,700 employees located in six offices. The firm provides a comprehensive portfolio of legal services to commercial and government clients.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?