Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Overview
For all of the years that I was in-house at major law firms, I came in contact with many attorneys from Canada. Many were women who I had the pleasure of calling colleagues and friends when I served on the Executive Committee of the ABA Women Rainmakers. I was struck by the fact that some 15 years ago, women in law firms in Canada were rising stars with their own books of business and held management positions within their firms. The U.S. firms were still lagging behind in bringing women to the forefront.
What was even more remarkable was the fact that many of the Canadian firms were very aggressive in, at the time, the very new concept of marketing and public-relations endeavors. I remember thinking that some day these firms would be recognized for their achievements as forward thinking and futurists.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?