Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

<b>Technology Uses & Costs</b>: Improved Cost Recovery for Imaging

By Todd Nugent
April 26, 2006

Chapman and Cutler LLP is a Chicago-based law firm focused on innovative and practical legal solutions for complex financial transactions. In addition to traditional financing, the firm, with its pool of 180 attorneys located in three offices, is widely recognized for its experience in specialized areas of finance. Keeping up with the pace of change in the financial arena, as well as the rapidly evolving needs of Chapman and Cutler's clients, has consistently challenged our IT group to provide the Chapman user community with the most up-to-date and efficient technology solutions. This was our objective last summer when we set out to replace and upgrade our firm's cost recovery systems.

Assessing Technology Requirements

While technology has progressed tremendously over the past decade, nowhere has this been more evident than within the complex financial transaction work in which Chapman and Cutler specializes. While we used to copy millions of pages a month and send out hundreds of overnight mail packages a day, current copying rates have dropped to a few hundred thousand pages, replaced by thousands of e-mails per day and 'scan to PDF and print' jobs totaling millions of pages. With these advances in technology have come heightened client expectations to complete work in minutes or hours, rather than days. This means our equipment has to be very reliable and easy to use, allowing the attorneys to spend their available time focused on legal work, not on mechanical problems with scanners, copiers and printers.

Reliability is Key

It was this primary business concern of technology and equipment reliability that led us down the path of reevaluating our cost recovery configuration for our newly acquired fleet of Canon 6750 multi-functional devices (MFDs), including 22 MFDs that support PDF scanning. The new fleet provides an aggregate scanning capacity of about 1500 pages per minute, a substantial increase over past devices.

The firm has generally been an 'early adopter' of technology; we introduced first generation multi-function equipment 14 years ago, and rolled out an all-digital copier/printer fleet in 1999. Nevertheless, the burgeoning needs of our staff and their clients required regular equipment upgrades, especially for PDF scanner technology.

In order to meet these scanning demands, we needed to add another PC box to the back of our Canon multifunction devices. Including external devices for the eCopy solution, the Canon Fiery image processor and our Equitrac cost recovery system with its own separate proprietary network and wiring, we had three external boxes, transforming each copy area into a computer room with a nest of cables and boxes. Of course, all those ex-posed boxes and cables meant reduced reliability.

Based on the time sensitivities of the firm's financial transaction work, high reliability has become a Chapman and Cutler specialty with 24/7 support. For example, we had no downtime in our e-mail and DMS systems at all last year, and only had a few hours of downtime over the last 5 years, delivering 6 Sigmas, or 99.9999% reliability.

Compared with this performance, the reliability of our first generation PDF scanning multifunction devices was laughable. They ran well enough to be usable, but attorneys and staff often had to hike between floors to find a working scanner. With our upgrade to new copier/printers and cost recovery we were determined to correct this situation.

Beyond reliability, the biggest issues with the existing setup were related to the technical support required to maintain the cost recovery hardware devices and unreasonably long problem resolution times. In fact, prior to exploring an embedded, software-centric solution such as nQueue, it was not uncommon for problem resolution times of our chargeback system to extend for days or even a week. While problems with the cost recovery system did not always incapacitate the Canon device, getting charges into our accounting system was sometimes delayed for long periods. With the propensity for the financial transactions that are our specialty to bill at closing, delayed cost recovery information generally means a complete loss of the revenue.

Cost Recovery Selection

During the selection process, a joint project between our IT and Office Services groups, we initially assumed our cost recovery options would be limited to the same relatively un-changed solutions we have chosen among for years: the usual vendors providing the usual hardware-centric, proprietary options. Relatively late in the game, during the selection among the final three vendors for the outsourcing contract including the MFD devices, we became aware that nQueue had recently released a product that could solve a number of these problems for us with fresh approaches.

While we were a little concerned about proposing such a major change only a few weeks from implementation, the nQueue sales and technical team were confident in their product and their ability to implement. They turned around the proposal, addressed all technical specifications, and calculated pricing, all within a matter of days. More importantly, they brought to the table a well-established partnership with eCopy, our vendor of choice for the PDF scanning component. Together, nQueue and eCopy partnered to provide exactly what we wanted: a software-based, integrated cost recovery solution that would help us meet our efficiency and reliability goals while reducing our reliance on proprietary hardware and constant external IT support.

A Winning Combination

nQueue, eCopy and Canon delivered their embedded solutions, which could run on the processor and display screen built into the firm's Canon Image Runner copier/printer/scanner machines. At first glance it seemed ideal to have all this new functionality without any external boxes or wires. Upon testing, however, we discovered that a completely embedded solution was not quite perfect for our firm.

With our focus on the 'scanning to PDF' process, our users type in substantive document information. (We import the PDFs right into our DMS so they become part of the electronic matter record even when we e-mail the documents directly to clients.) The smaller copier touch screens limited our users' ability to input these document descriptions. Happily, eCopy has an external screen and full size keyboard option to speed up this input, and nQueue provided the option to embed in the eCopy screen and keyboard rather than the small Canon touch display.

For the few color copiers and some fax machines without eCopy, nQueue also provided a Tablet PC option that our users have appreciated. Beyond getting rid of all that hardware ' a total of 52 external boxes! ' the embedded nQueue solution now uses the same TCP/IP LAN as all of our PCs and IP phones. This eliminates the extra cost of the separate proprietary network of our former cost recovery solution, and also eliminates an entire class of failures and outages.

Conclusion

While often the best technology innovations seem obvious in retrospect, in this case embedding the cost recovery inside the machine being tracked, it usually takes a new company like nQueue to embrace the future in this way.

To date, it looks like we have realized all our major goals in the cost recovery upgrade:

  • Fast implementation. With only 2.5 weeks between the final implementation decision and the install date, the nQueue services team got Chapman and Cutler up and running on time ' a very impressive feat considering we upgraded our entire fleet of 31 Cannon MFDs with a mix of eCopy embedded software and nQueue tablets on the six machines without eCopy.
  • Fast problem response times. Compared to our former cost recovery vendors, problems have been fewer and have been handled more promptly.
  • Overall reliability. The embedded nQueue along with more mature software versions from eCopy and Canon contributed to a significant increase in overall MFD functional reliability.
  • Lower total cost of ownership. With the external proprietary boxes eliminated from most MFD machines, our FM vendor saved money on the product acquisition ' which they passed on to us with a reduced monthly fee. With the elimination of the proprietary wiring, we have saved staff time on installs and trouble-shooting. Moreover, the cost of moving one of our offices to a new building was reduced this fall by the elimination of wiring, modem lines and special buffer hardware associated with the old cost recovery system.

Todd Nugent is Chapman and Cutler's CIO, having spent the last 16 years with the firm. Mr. Nugent is also on the Adjunct faculty of the University of Chicago, where he teaches graduate-level Computer Science courses in Networking and Operating Systems. This article originally appeared in LJN's Legal Tech Newsletter, a sibling publication of A&FP.

Chapman and Cutler LLP is a Chicago-based law firm focused on innovative and practical legal solutions for complex financial transactions. In addition to traditional financing, the firm, with its pool of 180 attorneys located in three offices, is widely recognized for its experience in specialized areas of finance. Keeping up with the pace of change in the financial arena, as well as the rapidly evolving needs of Chapman and Cutler's clients, has consistently challenged our IT group to provide the Chapman user community with the most up-to-date and efficient technology solutions. This was our objective last summer when we set out to replace and upgrade our firm's cost recovery systems.

Assessing Technology Requirements

While technology has progressed tremendously over the past decade, nowhere has this been more evident than within the complex financial transaction work in which Chapman and Cutler specializes. While we used to copy millions of pages a month and send out hundreds of overnight mail packages a day, current copying rates have dropped to a few hundred thousand pages, replaced by thousands of e-mails per day and 'scan to PDF and print' jobs totaling millions of pages. With these advances in technology have come heightened client expectations to complete work in minutes or hours, rather than days. This means our equipment has to be very reliable and easy to use, allowing the attorneys to spend their available time focused on legal work, not on mechanical problems with scanners, copiers and printers.

Reliability is Key

It was this primary business concern of technology and equipment reliability that led us down the path of reevaluating our cost recovery configuration for our newly acquired fleet of Canon 6750 multi-functional devices (MFDs), including 22 MFDs that support PDF scanning. The new fleet provides an aggregate scanning capacity of about 1500 pages per minute, a substantial increase over past devices.

The firm has generally been an 'early adopter' of technology; we introduced first generation multi-function equipment 14 years ago, and rolled out an all-digital copier/printer fleet in 1999. Nevertheless, the burgeoning needs of our staff and their clients required regular equipment upgrades, especially for PDF scanner technology.

In order to meet these scanning demands, we needed to add another PC box to the back of our Canon multifunction devices. Including external devices for the eCopy solution, the Canon Fiery image processor and our Equitrac cost recovery system with its own separate proprietary network and wiring, we had three external boxes, transforming each copy area into a computer room with a nest of cables and boxes. Of course, all those ex-posed boxes and cables meant reduced reliability.

Based on the time sensitivities of the firm's financial transaction work, high reliability has become a Chapman and Cutler specialty with 24/7 support. For example, we had no downtime in our e-mail and DMS systems at all last year, and only had a few hours of downtime over the last 5 years, delivering 6 Sigmas, or 99.9999% reliability.

Compared with this performance, the reliability of our first generation PDF scanning multifunction devices was laughable. They ran well enough to be usable, but attorneys and staff often had to hike between floors to find a working scanner. With our upgrade to new copier/printers and cost recovery we were determined to correct this situation.

Beyond reliability, the biggest issues with the existing setup were related to the technical support required to maintain the cost recovery hardware devices and unreasonably long problem resolution times. In fact, prior to exploring an embedded, software-centric solution such as nQueue, it was not uncommon for problem resolution times of our chargeback system to extend for days or even a week. While problems with the cost recovery system did not always incapacitate the Canon device, getting charges into our accounting system was sometimes delayed for long periods. With the propensity for the financial transactions that are our specialty to bill at closing, delayed cost recovery information generally means a complete loss of the revenue.

Cost Recovery Selection

During the selection process, a joint project between our IT and Office Services groups, we initially assumed our cost recovery options would be limited to the same relatively un-changed solutions we have chosen among for years: the usual vendors providing the usual hardware-centric, proprietary options. Relatively late in the game, during the selection among the final three vendors for the outsourcing contract including the MFD devices, we became aware that nQueue had recently released a product that could solve a number of these problems for us with fresh approaches.

While we were a little concerned about proposing such a major change only a few weeks from implementation, the nQueue sales and technical team were confident in their product and their ability to implement. They turned around the proposal, addressed all technical specifications, and calculated pricing, all within a matter of days. More importantly, they brought to the table a well-established partnership with eCopy, our vendor of choice for the PDF scanning component. Together, nQueue and eCopy partnered to provide exactly what we wanted: a software-based, integrated cost recovery solution that would help us meet our efficiency and reliability goals while reducing our reliance on proprietary hardware and constant external IT support.

A Winning Combination

nQueue, eCopy and Canon delivered their embedded solutions, which could run on the processor and display screen built into the firm's Canon Image Runner copier/printer/scanner machines. At first glance it seemed ideal to have all this new functionality without any external boxes or wires. Upon testing, however, we discovered that a completely embedded solution was not quite perfect for our firm.

With our focus on the 'scanning to PDF' process, our users type in substantive document information. (We import the PDFs right into our DMS so they become part of the electronic matter record even when we e-mail the documents directly to clients.) The smaller copier touch screens limited our users' ability to input these document descriptions. Happily, eCopy has an external screen and full size keyboard option to speed up this input, and nQueue provided the option to embed in the eCopy screen and keyboard rather than the small Canon touch display.

For the few color copiers and some fax machines without eCopy, nQueue also provided a Tablet PC option that our users have appreciated. Beyond getting rid of all that hardware ' a total of 52 external boxes! ' the embedded nQueue solution now uses the same TCP/IP LAN as all of our PCs and IP phones. This eliminates the extra cost of the separate proprietary network of our former cost recovery solution, and also eliminates an entire class of failures and outages.

Conclusion

While often the best technology innovations seem obvious in retrospect, in this case embedding the cost recovery inside the machine being tracked, it usually takes a new company like nQueue to embrace the future in this way.

To date, it looks like we have realized all our major goals in the cost recovery upgrade:

  • Fast implementation. With only 2.5 weeks between the final implementation decision and the install date, the nQueue services team got Chapman and Cutler up and running on time ' a very impressive feat considering we upgraded our entire fleet of 31 Cannon MFDs with a mix of eCopy embedded software and nQueue tablets on the six machines without eCopy.
  • Fast problem response times. Compared to our former cost recovery vendors, problems have been fewer and have been handled more promptly.
  • Overall reliability. The embedded nQueue along with more mature software versions from eCopy and Canon contributed to a significant increase in overall MFD functional reliability.
  • Lower total cost of ownership. With the external proprietary boxes eliminated from most MFD machines, our FM vendor saved money on the product acquisition ' which they passed on to us with a reduced monthly fee. With the elimination of the proprietary wiring, we have saved staff time on installs and trouble-shooting. Moreover, the cost of moving one of our offices to a new building was reduced this fall by the elimination of wiring, modem lines and special buffer hardware associated with the old cost recovery system.

Todd Nugent is Chapman and Cutler's CIO, having spent the last 16 years with the firm. Mr. Nugent is also on the Adjunct faculty of the University of Chicago, where he teaches graduate-level Computer Science courses in Networking and Operating Systems. This article originally appeared in LJN's Legal Tech Newsletter, a sibling publication of A&FP.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

'Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P.': A Tutorial On Contract Liability for Real Estate Purchasers Image

In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.

Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.