Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Proving ROI on Marketing By Measuring Marketing Effectiveness

By Larry Bodine and Suzanne Lowe
April 27, 2006

Management guru and author Peter Drucker said, 'If you can't measure it, you can't manage it.' So why is it that so few law firms measure their marketing efforts? Why is it that so many CMOs that are getting hammered by partners to demonstrate ROI on their efforts can't do it?

In our just-released 2006 study, 'Increasing Marketing Effectiveness At Professional Firms,' more than 377 senior marketing and management respondents gave us plenty of reasons:

  • Our people aren't inclines to measure.
  • It's hard to change their mindset.
  • Measurement is not viewed as a worthy activity.
  • Our people avoid accountability.
  • Measurement is perceived as too hard, too costly and too time consuming.
  • We're too small or new to have our act together.
  • Our marketing leadership is new.
  • We have no dedicated measurement resources.
  • We have no measurement budget.
  • We are in too much turmoil to focus on measurement.

Boo-hoo, we say. Measurement obstacles are largely self-caused, and are related to myopia, inertia, and avoidance of accountability. You better start proving a return-on-investment on your marketing efforts to keep your job. Here's how:

Measuring Marketing Effectiveness

For starters, your firm needs to have a budget for measuring marketing. We were very surprised that only a fraction of our respondents' firms have a separate budget line for evaluating the effectiveness of their marketing programs (340 said 'No' when asked if their firms have a separate line item for marketing measurement; only 37 said 'Yes').

Your argument before senior management to get this line item is that your firm could bring in more revenue, if only it deliberately added structure to measuring marketing effectiveness. 'Half the money I spend on advertising is wasted; the trouble is I don't know which half,' said department store merchant John Wanamaker. You don't want to be heard saying that.

Once you've got the funding, exactly what should you measure? According to our research, law service firms that want to excel at marketing should use these three Client Metrics.

  1. Growing client revenue. 'Did you grow revenues with your client or not?'
  2. Moving the phases of a sale through a pipeline. 'Did you close the sale or not?'
  3. Listening to the client. 'Did you listen to the client or not?'

Put another way, if you can't measure the results by one of these three metrics, you shouldn't pursue the marketing effort. You are wasting your time ' and risking your job.

These three Client Metrics are unequivocally objective and obvious, clearly identified with clients, and feature very tangible outcomes. They are fact-based and 'non-ignorable.' And the more Client Metrics our respondents used, the more they said they were 'extremely effective' in growing revenues against competitors.

What Other Law Firms Measure

So please forget about measuring marketing by counting the number of publicity hits, or number of attendees to your seminar, or number of magazine copies in which your advertisement appeared. These do not relate to points 1, 2 or 3 above. Push down the time you spend printing and rewriting brochures, writing ad copy, arranging menus for dinners, and developing branding campaigns. Delegate this work or send it to an outside agency.

Instead, be like survey respondent Patrick Lamb, a partner at Butler Rubin Saltarellli & Boyd in Chicago. 'When I arrived, the first thing we did was analyze how much revenue we were getting from our clients. We found that our revenue was concentrated in a small number of key clients. If any left, it would be catastrophic, so I decided we needed to do client satisfaction studies.

'I was able to convince the two senior rainmakers to try it. The senior partners were skeptical at very beginning; they hadn't heard about the approach, but there is a fairly compelling intellectual case you can make. They got very positive feedback from their clients. They were pleased that anybody would to take the time to find out what they think. By the time we got back from the first interview, the client had called the relationship partner and said it was great.'

Lamb said his firm keeps track of three things:

  1. The number of disputes that are brought to the firm;
  2. The size of these disputes; and
  3. The percentage of work the client is giving us.

Or follow the model of Lindsay Fikowski, Regional Marketing Manager for McCarthy T'trault based in Calgary, Alberta, Canada. A key marketing initiatives is to increase the firm's 'share of wallet' ' its share of the client's legal work. 'We ask clients what their legal spend will be for the next year, and this can lead into very detailed discussions. Our next step is to develop a profitability measure for each client. We're working on that,' she says.

The firm also pursues a targeting and segmenting program. McCarthy T'trault measures results by comparing the level of work in these key sectors against prior results. 'We try to estimate very roughly what our market share is based on our estimate of the client's legal spend. We try to figure out where we stand, whether we are the #1, #2, #3 or #4 firm for the client.'

'Lack of partner buy-in can be an obstacle,' she concedes. 'Marketing is very hard for the lawyers to do; they don't always know how to do it. They need to have a long-term plan in place ' at least 5 years ' because they may not see any work for 5 years. One year is too short-term for a plan,' she says. But she overcomes the internal obstacles because, 'we demonstrate the value of the our approach to the partners and find ways to make it useful to the partners.'

You Shall Overcome

The perception that measurement is challenging however, is real, and must be overcome. Our study outlined a law firm marketing team's main function: leading firms to succeed at five strategic marketing goals.

  1. Define and identify the most strategically important prospects/clients (ie, segmenting the market, targeting the 'right' clients, and prioritizing which clients or industries to pursue or to avoid).
  2. Acquire the most strategically important prospects/clients (ie, establishing a firm's attractiveness, credibility and thought leadership with the 'right' clients and successfully winning new engagements with those targeted prospects/clients).
  3. Retain the most strategically important clients (ie, fostering increasingly significant client/firm relationships, and successfully keeping current engagements with targeted clients).
  4. Increase the firm's amount of revenues with its most strategically important current clients (ie, known as cross-selling in some sectors, this means increasing each current client's use of the firm's entire service portfolio and the firm's penetration into that client's available 'share of wallet').
  5. Increase the perceived value of the firm to all audiences, including non-targeted prospects and clients, influencers, suppliers, and current and potential employees (ie, growing the firm's overall brand value and thought leadership equity; building broad awareness of the firm and its favorable reputation in its marketplace; and increasing its perceived eminence generally).

Measure your marketing and measure it well. Your firm will be glad that you did.


Larry Bodine is the founder of the LawMarketing Portal, www.LawMarket
ing.com, and a strategic marketing consultant based near Chicago. A member of MLF's Board of Editors, he advises firms on marketing strategy, individual coaching and retreat presentations. He can be reached at 630-942-0977, [email protected]. Suzanne Lowe is the founder of Expertise Marketing, LLC and the author of Marketplace Masters: How Professional Service Firms Compete to Win. Her blog Expertise Marketplace provides additional perspectives on professional services marketing. See www.expertisemarketplace.com for more information. Readers can find an 18-page summary of the study online at www.lawmarketing.com/Summaryof2006_study_result.pdf. To see the complete 80-page study and its accompanying 68-page case studies report visit www.lawmarketing.biz/store.

Management guru and author Peter Drucker said, 'If you can't measure it, you can't manage it.' So why is it that so few law firms measure their marketing efforts? Why is it that so many CMOs that are getting hammered by partners to demonstrate ROI on their efforts can't do it?

In our just-released 2006 study, 'Increasing Marketing Effectiveness At Professional Firms,' more than 377 senior marketing and management respondents gave us plenty of reasons:

  • Our people aren't inclines to measure.
  • It's hard to change their mindset.
  • Measurement is not viewed as a worthy activity.
  • Our people avoid accountability.
  • Measurement is perceived as too hard, too costly and too time consuming.
  • We're too small or new to have our act together.
  • Our marketing leadership is new.
  • We have no dedicated measurement resources.
  • We have no measurement budget.
  • We are in too much turmoil to focus on measurement.

Boo-hoo, we say. Measurement obstacles are largely self-caused, and are related to myopia, inertia, and avoidance of accountability. You better start proving a return-on-investment on your marketing efforts to keep your job. Here's how:

Measuring Marketing Effectiveness

For starters, your firm needs to have a budget for measuring marketing. We were very surprised that only a fraction of our respondents' firms have a separate budget line for evaluating the effectiveness of their marketing programs (340 said 'No' when asked if their firms have a separate line item for marketing measurement; only 37 said 'Yes').

Your argument before senior management to get this line item is that your firm could bring in more revenue, if only it deliberately added structure to measuring marketing effectiveness. 'Half the money I spend on advertising is wasted; the trouble is I don't know which half,' said department store merchant John Wanamaker. You don't want to be heard saying that.

Once you've got the funding, exactly what should you measure? According to our research, law service firms that want to excel at marketing should use these three Client Metrics.

  1. Growing client revenue. 'Did you grow revenues with your client or not?'
  2. Moving the phases of a sale through a pipeline. 'Did you close the sale or not?'
  3. Listening to the client. 'Did you listen to the client or not?'

Put another way, if you can't measure the results by one of these three metrics, you shouldn't pursue the marketing effort. You are wasting your time ' and risking your job.

These three Client Metrics are unequivocally objective and obvious, clearly identified with clients, and feature very tangible outcomes. They are fact-based and 'non-ignorable.' And the more Client Metrics our respondents used, the more they said they were 'extremely effective' in growing revenues against competitors.

What Other Law Firms Measure

So please forget about measuring marketing by counting the number of publicity hits, or number of attendees to your seminar, or number of magazine copies in which your advertisement appeared. These do not relate to points 1, 2 or 3 above. Push down the time you spend printing and rewriting brochures, writing ad copy, arranging menus for dinners, and developing branding campaigns. Delegate this work or send it to an outside agency.

Instead, be like survey respondent Patrick Lamb, a partner at Butler Rubin Saltarellli & Boyd in Chicago. 'When I arrived, the first thing we did was analyze how much revenue we were getting from our clients. We found that our revenue was concentrated in a small number of key clients. If any left, it would be catastrophic, so I decided we needed to do client satisfaction studies.

'I was able to convince the two senior rainmakers to try it. The senior partners were skeptical at very beginning; they hadn't heard about the approach, but there is a fairly compelling intellectual case you can make. They got very positive feedback from their clients. They were pleased that anybody would to take the time to find out what they think. By the time we got back from the first interview, the client had called the relationship partner and said it was great.'

Lamb said his firm keeps track of three things:

  1. The number of disputes that are brought to the firm;
  2. The size of these disputes; and
  3. The percentage of work the client is giving us.

Or follow the model of Lindsay Fikowski, Regional Marketing Manager for McCarthy T'trault based in Calgary, Alberta, Canada. A key marketing initiatives is to increase the firm's 'share of wallet' ' its share of the client's legal work. 'We ask clients what their legal spend will be for the next year, and this can lead into very detailed discussions. Our next step is to develop a profitability measure for each client. We're working on that,' she says.

The firm also pursues a targeting and segmenting program. McCarthy T'trault measures results by comparing the level of work in these key sectors against prior results. 'We try to estimate very roughly what our market share is based on our estimate of the client's legal spend. We try to figure out where we stand, whether we are the #1, #2, #3 or #4 firm for the client.'

'Lack of partner buy-in can be an obstacle,' she concedes. 'Marketing is very hard for the lawyers to do; they don't always know how to do it. They need to have a long-term plan in place ' at least 5 years ' because they may not see any work for 5 years. One year is too short-term for a plan,' she says. But she overcomes the internal obstacles because, 'we demonstrate the value of the our approach to the partners and find ways to make it useful to the partners.'

You Shall Overcome

The perception that measurement is challenging however, is real, and must be overcome. Our study outlined a law firm marketing team's main function: leading firms to succeed at five strategic marketing goals.

  1. Define and identify the most strategically important prospects/clients (ie, segmenting the market, targeting the 'right' clients, and prioritizing which clients or industries to pursue or to avoid).
  2. Acquire the most strategically important prospects/clients (ie, establishing a firm's attractiveness, credibility and thought leadership with the 'right' clients and successfully winning new engagements with those targeted prospects/clients).
  3. Retain the most strategically important clients (ie, fostering increasingly significant client/firm relationships, and successfully keeping current engagements with targeted clients).
  4. Increase the firm's amount of revenues with its most strategically important current clients (ie, known as cross-selling in some sectors, this means increasing each current client's use of the firm's entire service portfolio and the firm's penetration into that client's available 'share of wallet').
  5. Increase the perceived value of the firm to all audiences, including non-targeted prospects and clients, influencers, suppliers, and current and potential employees (ie, growing the firm's overall brand value and thought leadership equity; building broad awareness of the firm and its favorable reputation in its marketplace; and increasing its perceived eminence generally).

Measure your marketing and measure it well. Your firm will be glad that you did.


Larry Bodine is the founder of the LawMarketing Portal, www.LawMarket
ing.com, and a strategic marketing consultant based near Chicago. A member of MLF's Board of Editors, he advises firms on marketing strategy, individual coaching and retreat presentations. He can be reached at 630-942-0977, [email protected]. Suzanne Lowe is the founder of Expertise Marketing, LLC and the author of Marketplace Masters: How Professional Service Firms Compete to Win. Her blog Expertise Marketplace provides additional perspectives on professional services marketing. See www.expertisemarketplace.com for more information. Readers can find an 18-page summary of the study online at www.lawmarketing.com/Summaryof2006_study_result.pdf. To see the complete 80-page study and its accompanying 68-page case studies report visit www.lawmarketing.biz/store.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.

Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York Image

In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?