Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
[Editor's Note: As in justifying many other law firm investments, ROI for marketing seems statistically elusive. Perhaps law firm financial strategists could be helpful to firm marketing specialists in quantifying metrics such as those advocated here.]
Management guru and author Peter Drucker said, 'If you can't measure it, you can't manage it.' So why is it that so few law firms measure their marketing efforts? Why is it that so many Chief Marketing Officers (CMOs) who are getting hammered by partners to demonstrate ROI on their efforts can't do it?
In our just-released 2006 study, 'Increasing Marketing Effectiveness at Professional Firms,' more than 377 senior marketing and management respondents gave us plenty of reasons:
We say, however, that measurement obstacles are largely self-caused, and are related to myopia, inertia, and avoidance of accountability. Here's how to start proving a return-on-investment on your marketing efforts.
Measuring Marketing Effectiveness
For starters, your firm needs to have a budget for measuring marketing. We were very surprised that only a fraction of our respondents' firms have a separate budget line for evaluating the effectiveness of their marketing programs (340 said 'No' when asked if their firms have a separate line item for marketing measurement; only 37 said 'Yes').
Your argument before senior management to get this line item is that your firm could bring in more revenue, if only it deliberately added structure to measuring marketing effectiveness.
Once you've got the funding, exactly what should you measure? According to our research, law service firms that want to excel at marketing should use these three Client Metrics:
Put another way, if you can't measure the results by one of these three metrics, you shouldn't pursue the marketing effort.
These three Client Metrics are unequivocally objective and obvious, clearly identified with clients, and feature very tangible outcomes. They are fact-based and 'non-ignorable.' And the more Client Metrics our respondents used, the more they said they were 'extremely effective' in growing revenues against competitors.
What Other Law Firms Measure
So please forget about measuring marketing by counting the number of publicity hits, or number of attendees to your seminar, or number of magazine copies in which your advertisement appeared. These do not relate to points 1, 2 or 3 above. Push down the time you spend printing and rewriting brochures, writing ad copy, arranging menus for dinners, and developing branding campaigns. Delegate this work or send it to an outside agency.
Instead, be like survey respondent Patrick Lamb, a partner at Butler Rubin Saltarelli & Boyd in Chicago. 'When I arrived, the first thing we did was analyze how much revenue we were getting from our clients. We found that our revenue was concentrated in a small number of key clients. If any left, it would be catastrophic, so I decided we needed to do client satisfaction studies.
'I was able to convince the two senior rainmakers to try it. The senior partners were skeptical at very beginning; they hadn't heard about the approach, but there is a fairly compelling intellectual case you can make. They got very positive feedback from their clients. They were pleased that anybody would to take the time to find out what they think. By the time we got back from the first interview, the client had called the relationship partner and said it was great.'
Lamb said his firm keeps track of three things:
Or follow the model of Lindsay Fikowski, Regional Marketing Manager for McCarthy T'trault based in Calgary, Alberta, Canada. A key of marketing initiatives is increasing the firm's 'share of wallet' ' its share of the client's legal work. 'We ask clients what their legal spend will be for the next year, and this can lead into very detailed discussions. Our next step is to develop a profitability measure for each client. We're working on that,' she says.
The firm also pursues a targeting and segmenting program. McCarthy T'trault measures results by comparing the level of work in these key sectors against prior results. 'We try to estimate very roughly what our market share is based on our estimate of the client's legal spend. We try to figure out where we stand, whether we are the #1, #2, #3 or #4 firm for the client.'
'Lack of partner buy-in can be an obstacle,' she concedes. 'Marketing is very hard for the lawyers to do; they don't always know how to do it. They need to have a long-term plan in place ' at least 5 years ' because they may not see any work for 5 years. One year is too short-term for a plan,' she says. To overcome resistance to measurement-based self-evaluation, 'We de-monstrate the value of our approach to the partners and find ways to make it useful to the partners.'
Aligning Metrics With Marketing Strategy
The perception that measurement is challenging however, is real, and must be overcome. Our study outlined a law firm marketing team's main function ” leading firms to succeed at five strategic marketing goals:
Measure your marketing and measure it well. Your firm will be glad that you did.
[Editor's Note: As in justifying many other law firm investments, ROI for marketing seems statistically elusive. Perhaps law firm financial strategists could be helpful to firm marketing specialists in quantifying metrics such as those advocated here.]
Management guru and author Peter Drucker said, 'If you can't measure it, you can't manage it.' So why is it that so few law firms measure their marketing efforts? Why is it that so many Chief Marketing Officers (CMOs) who are getting hammered by partners to demonstrate ROI on their efforts can't do it?
In our just-released 2006 study, 'Increasing Marketing Effectiveness at Professional Firms,' more than 377 senior marketing and management respondents gave us plenty of reasons:
We say, however, that measurement obstacles are largely self-caused, and are related to myopia, inertia, and avoidance of accountability. Here's how to start proving a return-on-investment on your marketing efforts.
Measuring Marketing Effectiveness
For starters, your firm needs to have a budget for measuring marketing. We were very surprised that only a fraction of our respondents' firms have a separate budget line for evaluating the effectiveness of their marketing programs (340 said 'No' when asked if their firms have a separate line item for marketing measurement; only 37 said 'Yes').
Your argument before senior management to get this line item is that your firm could bring in more revenue, if only it deliberately added structure to measuring marketing effectiveness.
Once you've got the funding, exactly what should you measure? According to our research, law service firms that want to excel at marketing should use these three Client Metrics:
Put another way, if you can't measure the results by one of these three metrics, you shouldn't pursue the marketing effort.
These three Client Metrics are unequivocally objective and obvious, clearly identified with clients, and feature very tangible outcomes. They are fact-based and 'non-ignorable.' And the more Client Metrics our respondents used, the more they said they were 'extremely effective' in growing revenues against competitors.
What Other Law Firms Measure
So please forget about measuring marketing by counting the number of publicity hits, or number of attendees to your seminar, or number of magazine copies in which your advertisement appeared. These do not relate to points 1, 2 or 3 above. Push down the time you spend printing and rewriting brochures, writing ad copy, arranging menus for dinners, and developing branding campaigns. Delegate this work or send it to an outside agency.
Instead, be like survey respondent Patrick Lamb, a partner at Butler Rubin Saltarelli & Boyd in Chicago. 'When I arrived, the first thing we did was analyze how much revenue we were getting from our clients. We found that our revenue was concentrated in a small number of key clients. If any left, it would be catastrophic, so I decided we needed to do client satisfaction studies.
'I was able to convince the two senior rainmakers to try it. The senior partners were skeptical at very beginning; they hadn't heard about the approach, but there is a fairly compelling intellectual case you can make. They got very positive feedback from their clients. They were pleased that anybody would to take the time to find out what they think. By the time we got back from the first interview, the client had called the relationship partner and said it was great.'
Lamb said his firm keeps track of three things:
Or follow the model of Lindsay Fikowski, Regional Marketing Manager for McCarthy T'trault based in Calgary, Alberta, Canada. A key of marketing initiatives is increasing the firm's 'share of wallet' ' its share of the client's legal work. 'We ask clients what their legal spend will be for the next year, and this can lead into very detailed discussions. Our next step is to develop a profitability measure for each client. We're working on that,' she says.
The firm also pursues a targeting and segmenting program. McCarthy T'trault measures results by comparing the level of work in these key sectors against prior results. 'We try to estimate very roughly what our market share is based on our estimate of the client's legal spend. We try to figure out where we stand, whether we are the #1, #2, #3 or #4 firm for the client.'
'Lack of partner buy-in can be an obstacle,' she concedes. 'Marketing is very hard for the lawyers to do; they don't always know how to do it. They need to have a long-term plan in place ' at least 5 years ' because they may not see any work for 5 years. One year is too short-term for a plan,' she says. To overcome resistance to measurement-based self-evaluation, 'We de-monstrate the value of our approach to the partners and find ways to make it useful to the partners.'
Aligning Metrics With Marketing Strategy
The perception that measurement is challenging however, is real, and must be overcome. Our study outlined a law firm marketing team's main function ” leading firms to succeed at five strategic marketing goals:
Measure your marketing and measure it well. Your firm will be glad that you did.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.