Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
[Editor's Note: In a February A&FP article titled 'Associate Overcompensation?' I ventured the opinion that competition for the most promising new associates was perhaps needlessly intense, given that law firms aren't very good at identifying which law school graduates actually will turn into excellent lawyers. The following interesting report seems to invite essentially the same question with regard to law student summer associates.]
Fewer law students and a brisk legal market mean that more law firms may need to start sharing their summer associates.
Depending on the part of the country, many law firms historically have been reluctant to allow law students to split their summer jobs between two law firms. And firms that do permit split summers often insist that students spend the first half of the season at their shops.
But job-placement professionals say that market forces are prompting firms to rethink their policies in order to get top students through their doors ' if only for a few weeks. 'The smart ones are accommodating the students,' says Marina Sirras, president of the National Association of Legal Search Consultants.
Some 669 law firms among the 1,723 listed in the directory of the National Association for Law Placement (NALP) allow students to split their summers. Many firms permit their summer associates to work the second half with a public-interest organization.
But an increasing number, especially in Northern California, are allowing two-firm splits, says Lisa Dickinson, president of NALP. She says that summer splits have not been common in the San Francisco area, but that the market is changing. 'It's been a trend that never truly caught on in Northern California, but I do hear that firms are more and more saying they'll do it for the first half.'
Elsewhere, splits have been more common. Miller, Canfield, Paddock and Stone's hiring partner Deborah Thompson says that although split summers are not the Detroit-based firm's 'favorite thing in the world,' the 350-attorney law firm is 'really quite flexible' in permitting students to join the firm during the first half or the second half of the summer. 'We're not afraid to let them split,' she says.
Basic supply and demand means that more firms could assume Miller Canfield's attitude. Last year, law school applications dropped for the first time since 1997. Some 4.6% fewer people applied to law schools in 2005, according to the Law School Admission Council.
At the same time, on-campus recruiting for Fall 2005 went up, according to NALP, which found that half of the law schools nationwide reported an increase of 5% or more in the number of employers on campus.
In addition, revenues among the nation's 100 highest-grossing law firms hit a combined $51 billion in 2005, an 11% increase from 2004, according to The American Lawyer, an ALM affiliate of A&FP.
Susan Robinson, Stanford Law School's associate dean for career services, says that the strength of the market dictates how accommodating law firms are to summer splits. She adds, however, that firms can be stubborn about requiring students to spend the first half with them.
Law firms often insist on the first half for a variety of reasons, Robinson says. Summer associate programs have become increasingly structured in recent years, with more firms implementing rigid starting dates and ending dates. Permitting students to come in halfway through can disrupt the flow of these programs and leave newcomers feeling alienated from other summer associates who have already bonded with each other, she says.
In addition, law firms tend to dole out the best assignments to summer associates at the beginning of the summer. The concern is that summer associates who join firms in the second half may have an inferior experience, making them less willing to sign with the firm once they graduate.
Washington's Steptoe & Johnson is sticking to its policy of refusing to hire students for the second half of the season, says Rosemary Kelly Morgan, director of attorney services and recruiting for the 412-attorney firm. 'It's very hard to say no, but we think we make a better impression in the beginning of the summer,' she says.
[Editor's Note: In a February A&FP article titled 'Associate Overcompensation?' I ventured the opinion that competition for the most promising new associates was perhaps needlessly intense, given that law firms aren't very good at identifying which law school graduates actually will turn into excellent lawyers. The following interesting report seems to invite essentially the same question with regard to law student summer associates.]
Fewer law students and a brisk legal market mean that more law firms may need to start sharing their summer associates.
Depending on the part of the country, many law firms historically have been reluctant to allow law students to split their summer jobs between two law firms. And firms that do permit split summers often insist that students spend the first half of the season at their shops.
But job-placement professionals say that market forces are prompting firms to rethink their policies in order to get top students through their doors ' if only for a few weeks. 'The smart ones are accommodating the students,' says Marina Sirras, president of the National Association of Legal Search Consultants.
Some 669 law firms among the 1,723 listed in the directory of the National Association for Law Placement (NALP) allow students to split their summers. Many firms permit their summer associates to work the second half with a public-interest organization.
But an increasing number, especially in Northern California, are allowing two-firm splits, says Lisa Dickinson, president of NALP. She says that summer splits have not been common in the San Francisco area, but that the market is changing. 'It's been a trend that never truly caught on in Northern California, but I do hear that firms are more and more saying they'll do it for the first half.'
Elsewhere, splits have been more common.
Basic supply and demand means that more firms could assume
At the same time, on-campus recruiting for Fall 2005 went up, according to NALP, which found that half of the law schools nationwide reported an increase of 5% or more in the number of employers on campus.
In addition, revenues among the nation's 100 highest-grossing law firms hit a combined $51 billion in 2005, an 11% increase from 2004, according to The American Lawyer, an ALM affiliate of A&FP.
Susan Robinson,
Law firms often insist on the first half for a variety of reasons, Robinson says. Summer associate programs have become increasingly structured in recent years, with more firms implementing rigid starting dates and ending dates. Permitting students to come in halfway through can disrupt the flow of these programs and leave newcomers feeling alienated from other summer associates who have already bonded with each other, she says.
In addition, law firms tend to dole out the best assignments to summer associates at the beginning of the summer. The concern is that summer associates who join firms in the second half may have an inferior experience, making them less willing to sign with the firm once they graduate.
Washington's
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.