Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The Prudent Investor Rule
Philip Greely, the senior partner of a large old-line law firm, was pleased and not terribly surprised when a valued client asked him to serve as trustee of a substantial trust that was being established for the benefit of the client's children. After all, Greely was highly regarded for his judgment and experience, and this assignment offered him the opportunity to further cement the bonds he had established over time with the client.
Greely also felt confident that he was up to the task, having managed his own financial affairs for many years. His personal investment portfolio was conservative and high in quality, consisting exclusively of 'blue chip' U.S. stocks and government bonds. In addition, he sat on his firm's Investment Committee, which handled the management of the firm's sizeable pension plan. Although he was somewhat passive in his participation on the committee, he knew that the plan's assets, too, were safely invested in large U.S. companies and Treasury bonds.
Because this new assignment as trustee involved one of his biggest clients ' and someone else's money ' in an abundance of caution Greely decided to investigate whether the position involved any additional or unexpected responsibilities. He asked one of his firm's associates to research the issue and let him know what was expected of him under the requirements of the law. A short while later the associate returned and informed Greely that the entire answer was contained in a portion of the state's code that articulated what is known as 'The Prudent Investor Rule.'
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?