Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Real-time collaboration (RTC) has advanced to a point where its advantages bring benefits to almost every aspect of organizational communications. For law firms, RTC makes possible new ways of working that are simple to adopt, easy to afford, require little or no CapEx and, in most cases, utilize existing computer and peripheral equipment. RTC can bring together employees, clients, trainers and others in ways that save time and overcome distance, thereby delivering measurable competitive advantage.
What is RTC?
In a nutshell, RTC is audio, video and Web conferencing ' all in one, online, all the time. RTC eliminates such inefficiencies as:
Voice, video and data can instead all be integrated and delivered to regular PCs and laptops over broadband Internet (or other IP).
RTC allows users to:
Best of all, you get to choose what you want to do. If you do not need the video, shut it off. If you need to be on a videoconference but you are on the road, no problem ' simply 'invite' the host videoconferencing system (by its IP address) into the RTC system's virtual meeting room or classroom.
How RTC Can Benefit the Law Firm
Aside from its positive impact on organizational communication generally, RTC can provide advantages of especially high interest to law firms:
Choosing an RTC Supplier
There are many RTC options and many suppliers to choose from, so a law firm can maximize its advantage by shopping carefully.
First, the firm can either buy a license for the software and support, or it can subscribe to a hosted service. If a firm licenses the software, it risks ending up locked into a solution with which it is not happy. The firm will also end up with server hardware. Unless the firm is a large enterprise with a real-time voice, video and data-savvy IT group, it's generally a good idea to initially deploy a hosted solution. That way, a firm can learn if RTC is the right choice. The firm can always decide to buy later.
Second, here is a list of key questions a firm should ask suppliers before making an RTC decision:
Above all, any RTC solution a law firm adopts should be intuitive and should streamline workflow, not increase it. After all, your business is the law ' not RTC technology.
R. L. (Rick) Marciniak is the CMO of Vemics, Inc. (www.vemics.com), a provider of customized hosted applications for real-time conferencing and collaboration. Marciniak holds a Master's degree in Communication Design and is a member of the e-Learning Guild and the Design Management Institute. He can be reached at 617-670-2401 or [email protected].
Real-time collaboration (RTC) has advanced to a point where its advantages bring benefits to almost every aspect of organizational communications. For law firms, RTC makes possible new ways of working that are simple to adopt, easy to afford, require little or no CapEx and, in most cases, utilize existing computer and peripheral equipment. RTC can bring together employees, clients, trainers and others in ways that save time and overcome distance, thereby delivering measurable competitive advantage.
What is RTC?
In a nutshell, RTC is audio, video and Web conferencing ' all in one, online, all the time. RTC eliminates such inefficiencies as:
Voice, video and data can instead all be integrated and delivered to regular PCs and laptops over broadband Internet (or other IP).
RTC allows users to:
Best of all, you get to choose what you want to do. If you do not need the video, shut it off. If you need to be on a videoconference but you are on the road, no problem ' simply 'invite' the host videoconferencing system (by its IP address) into the RTC system's virtual meeting room or classroom.
How RTC Can Benefit the Law Firm
Aside from its positive impact on organizational communication generally, RTC can provide advantages of especially high interest to law firms:
Choosing an RTC Supplier
There are many RTC options and many suppliers to choose from, so a law firm can maximize its advantage by shopping carefully.
First, the firm can either buy a license for the software and support, or it can subscribe to a hosted service. If a firm licenses the software, it risks ending up locked into a solution with which it is not happy. The firm will also end up with server hardware. Unless the firm is a large enterprise with a real-time voice, video and data-savvy IT group, it's generally a good idea to initially deploy a hosted solution. That way, a firm can learn if RTC is the right choice. The firm can always decide to buy later.
Second, here is a list of key questions a firm should ask suppliers before making an RTC decision:
Above all, any RTC solution a law firm adopts should be intuitive and should streamline workflow, not increase it. After all, your business is the law ' not RTC technology.
R. L. (Rick) Marciniak is the CMO of Vemics, Inc. (www.vemics.com), a provider of customized hosted applications for real-time conferencing and collaboration. Marciniak holds a Master's degree in Communication Design and is a member of the e-Learning Guild and the Design Management Institute. He can be reached at 617-670-2401 or [email protected].
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.