Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The fight over cash balance plans is proving to be one for the ages. A hybrid of defined contribution (DC) and defined benefit (DB) pension plans, cash balance plans have engendered both confusion and dispute over the appropriate framework for analyzing their compliance with applicable law. Two recent conflicting decisions issued by the same U.S. District Court in New York reveal a continuing absence of clarity about the plans' legality, despite support given in August by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in the Cooper v. IBM decision and by Congress in the Pension Protection Act of 2006 (PPA).
This article reviews recent developments, focusing on features of cash balance plans that have proven problematic, and on the prospect for a solution under the PPA.
Overview of Cash Balance Plan Design
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?