Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

<b>Sales & Service Strategies:</b> Nine Ways to Provide Superior Client Service

By Adam L. Stock
November 30, 2006

Most businesses have come to recognize that it takes 'an entire company' to provide superior products and services. Multiple surveys of outside legal services purchasing by Fortune 1000 General Counsel have shown that superior client service delivers greater client loyalty, higher fees and nearly twice business, yet few law firms tap the 'non-legal' resources readily available to deliver superior client service.

Improving client service is especially important, as general counsels of large companies have revealed to BTI Consulting that more than two-thirds would not recommend their primary law firm, 50% plan to try a new law firm for a substantive matter this year and they plan to cut nearly 40% of their outside firms by 2008. With decreasing client loyalty, firms need to spend more time improving client service as well as building barriers to entries to other outside law firms.

This gap between service capabilities and service delivery can be explained partially by the rapid consolidation of major law firms and partially by the way that client accounts are managed. With the continuing consolidation of major law firms ' the AmLaw 100 represent enterprises with annual revenues between $220 million and $1.6 billion ' there are increasing resources of technology, information and relationships that can be applied to needs and benefits of their clients. Client management, however, has not evolved as quickly. In most law firms attorneys the play dual roles of 'account manager,' the person responsible for the growth and quality of services, and 'primary service provider,' the person responsible for delivery of the services, and these roles are often at odds. Furthermore, the universal measure ' the billable hour ' puts a premium on doing work rather than examining better ways to deliver client service.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Legal Possession: What Does It Mean? Image

Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.

The Anti-Assignment Override Provisions Image

UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?