Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In the midst of 2006, Jaffe's public relations group turned its attention to some of the most notable law firm media and communications professionals currently working in house. Thanks to the candor of these people, we were able to provide snapshots of their work, their departments and their insight about law firm marketing. On behalf of the Jaffe authors, I again thank all of the participants for their time and their thoughtfulness. As we wrap up 2006, let's look back at some of the highlights in the series.
To kick off our series, Joshua M. Peck, Senior Manager, Media Relations at Duane Morris in Philadelphia was interviewed by Jaffe's Vivian Hood. Peck's path to law firm public relations began in the world of journalism, and led him to a position with Jaffe Associates. From there, he worked at Kirkland & Ellis; Hughes, Hubbard & Reed (as CMO); and now at Duane Morris. Josh and his marketing group support more than 600 lawyers in 19 offices. Josh set the tone of our series by indicating that 'Law firm PR as a tool is now seen as instrumental and integral to a firm's business strategy, much more so than it was 10-15 years ago. That's especially true of Duane Morris.' And Josh himself is very active within the profession, as the founder and president of the Law Firm Media Professionals group that meets monthly in New York, recently started a group in Chicago and now has its own Web site as http://www.lfmp.org/.
Our second interview subject was Hank Shafran, Director of Commu-nications in charge of internal and external communications for Bingham McCutchen. Hank was interviewed by Jaffe's Cari Brunelle. Hank reports to the chairman and COO of the firm, which has been on an aggressive growth plan for focused diversification in both clients and geography. Hank said that unlike many firms, getting his partners to participate in the public relations efforts is not difficult. 'Nothing succeeds like success, and there is never a shortage of partners who want to participate,' said Shafran. Like Peck, Shafran has seen the attitude toward law firm public relations change over the years. 'There is much more recognition and appreciation of PR within law firms now. When I came inside the firm in 1995, there weren't too many believers. But we've shown that if you develop a strategic PR plan that feeds off the marketing and business development plan, they complement each other. And now there are far more believers than disbelievers.'
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?