Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

The Case for Mentorship

By Kristy Weathers
May 30, 2007

Career guidelines, career plans and mentors. These are familiar terms to most lawyers, especially law students and laterals looking for the right 'fit.' And many, if not most, large law firms highlight one or more of these career-planning tools on their Web sites and recruiting materials. But the 'inside' story of their effectiveness might not be as rosy. Several recent articles in legal journals and newspapers have bemoaned the state of mentoring programs at larger firms, saying that they are boilerplate, empty promises designed to recruit, and that they are usually unsuccessful due to lack of follow-up.

However, here at Sutherland Asbill & Brennan, our mentorship program has never been stronger. How do we know it is a success? It has a 100% participation rate, with 170 partner/associate pairs communicating at least quarterly. A successful program is important to the firm and its people, and effective organization and administration can make the difference between a program that is meaningful and one that is merely an empty promise.

Sutherland's Career Planning Program

Mentoring is the foundation of Sutherland's Career Planning Program. Through this program, we provide associates with what we feel is a unique, structured approach to career planning through career guidelines, individualized career plans, and partner plan advisers. The guidelines (developed with input from partners and associates and designed for each practice group) outline the firm's expectations of associates, and the career plans allow each associate, based on his/her individual interests, to identify specific annual goals and action items for reaching those goals. Associates give their top three preferences for a partner plan adviser, and communicate quarterly with their assigned partner to discuss their plans and overall development.

Taken individually, these tools are nothing new to most firms. But where the program at Sutherland differs is that in our opinion, it is one of the few, if not the first, to offer all of these tools in one comprehensive program with administrative oversight. And as the participation rate demonstrates, it works.

Why Does It Matter?

A well-run program not only can be an invaluable recruiting and retention tool, it can make practicing law more rewarding and less stressful. It also provides a meaningful vehicle for regular feedback and guidance as part of and prior to the associate review process. Many of our senior partners praise our career-planning program as helping to bring back the one-on-one mentoring they experienced during their days as young lawyers, and which they say has been lost as many firms exceed several hundred lawyers.

Explains senior litigation partner John Bonds: 'When I was an associate, I was able to roll up my sleeves and work on a case or a project with every partner in our Atlanta office. That experience for me and others provided a sort of institutional glue that has made my professional life considerably more rewarding than it otherwise might have been. I think of our Career Planning Program as sort of a more concentrated dose of the same medicine ' a way of making sure that we are all part of the same whole.'

Steve Boehm, a senior corporate partner, emphasizes that 'Giving associates clear guidance and helping them succeed is not only enjoyable to the mentor, it reduces the uncertainly and stress an associate may feel if he/she is not engaging in regular career development discussions. As a firm, we want to do everything possible to put associates in positions where they can excel if they are willing to do their part.'

Associate Molley Clarkson agrees, noting that 'The program has made me think about my career in a big-picture way. It's very easy to get caught up in the specifics of your current workload and forget to think about your long-term goals and priorities. My partner-mentor helps me create and stick to my plan, while giving me practical advice and insight about how to reach my goals.'

What Makes Our Program Work

Allowing associates to have a say in picking their mentor. As noted above, Sutherland associates give us their three top preferences for a partner plan adviser. We do not guarantee that an associate will get one of his/her preferences (although most, if not all, do). However, allowing them to give their preferences not only assures that the associates are comfortable with that partner, but that the partner feels a sense of personal responsibility for the particular associate with whom he/she is matched.

Providing meeting topics and deadlines. Attorneys appreciate clear, concise directions and deadlines so they can use their time efficiently. We make it as simple as possible for our lawyers by providing topics, deadlines for meeting, reminders, clear examples of action items, and so forth. The less work required of the attorney, the more likely the program is to succeed.

Providing administrative oversight. We follow up with each pairing to ensure that they communicate on a quarterly basis. Busy schedules for both partners and associates can make it difficult to find a mutually convenient time to meet, but we have found that reminder e-mails and phone calls work.

Building support from firm leadership. Structure and oversight are key, but as always, it's a firm's culture that will play a large part in the success or failure of a mentoring program. At Sutherland, the emphasis on training and mentoring comes from the top, and the support of our managing partner, governing committee and all of the practice group leaders is unwavering. If partners are busy with billable work, the first thing that can get lost is the responsibility for training and providing feedback to younger lawyers. But if the importance of mentoring is truly conveyed to partners, they will consider it an integral part of their job.

Conclusion

Is a good program worth the effort? A quote from one of our associates best sums up the value of a mentoring program that works: 'The greatest benefit of our Career Planning Program is that it institutionalizes the mentoring process and makes you really think about your career and how you are progressing, as well as giving you the opportunity to discuss these issues on a regular basis with your partner adviser. Most large firms have something about mentoring on their Web sites, but I appreciate that Sutherland provides the structure and support it takes to make it work. They actually take the time to make sure that everyone is meeting. To me, that makes the difference between a program that works versus an empty promise.'


Kristy Weathers is a former practicing attorney and now serves
as Sutherland Asbill & Brennan's Director of Professional Development. Based in the firm's Atlanta office, she can be reached at [email protected].

Career guidelines, career plans and mentors. These are familiar terms to most lawyers, especially law students and laterals looking for the right 'fit.' And many, if not most, large law firms highlight one or more of these career-planning tools on their Web sites and recruiting materials. But the 'inside' story of their effectiveness might not be as rosy. Several recent articles in legal journals and newspapers have bemoaned the state of mentoring programs at larger firms, saying that they are boilerplate, empty promises designed to recruit, and that they are usually unsuccessful due to lack of follow-up.

However, here at Sutherland Asbill & Brennan, our mentorship program has never been stronger. How do we know it is a success? It has a 100% participation rate, with 170 partner/associate pairs communicating at least quarterly. A successful program is important to the firm and its people, and effective organization and administration can make the difference between a program that is meaningful and one that is merely an empty promise.

Sutherland's Career Planning Program

Mentoring is the foundation of Sutherland's Career Planning Program. Through this program, we provide associates with what we feel is a unique, structured approach to career planning through career guidelines, individualized career plans, and partner plan advisers. The guidelines (developed with input from partners and associates and designed for each practice group) outline the firm's expectations of associates, and the career plans allow each associate, based on his/her individual interests, to identify specific annual goals and action items for reaching those goals. Associates give their top three preferences for a partner plan adviser, and communicate quarterly with their assigned partner to discuss their plans and overall development.

Taken individually, these tools are nothing new to most firms. But where the program at Sutherland differs is that in our opinion, it is one of the few, if not the first, to offer all of these tools in one comprehensive program with administrative oversight. And as the participation rate demonstrates, it works.

Why Does It Matter?

A well-run program not only can be an invaluable recruiting and retention tool, it can make practicing law more rewarding and less stressful. It also provides a meaningful vehicle for regular feedback and guidance as part of and prior to the associate review process. Many of our senior partners praise our career-planning program as helping to bring back the one-on-one mentoring they experienced during their days as young lawyers, and which they say has been lost as many firms exceed several hundred lawyers.

Explains senior litigation partner John Bonds: 'When I was an associate, I was able to roll up my sleeves and work on a case or a project with every partner in our Atlanta office. That experience for me and others provided a sort of institutional glue that has made my professional life considerably more rewarding than it otherwise might have been. I think of our Career Planning Program as sort of a more concentrated dose of the same medicine ' a way of making sure that we are all part of the same whole.'

Steve Boehm, a senior corporate partner, emphasizes that 'Giving associates clear guidance and helping them succeed is not only enjoyable to the mentor, it reduces the uncertainly and stress an associate may feel if he/she is not engaging in regular career development discussions. As a firm, we want to do everything possible to put associates in positions where they can excel if they are willing to do their part.'

Associate Molley Clarkson agrees, noting that 'The program has made me think about my career in a big-picture way. It's very easy to get caught up in the specifics of your current workload and forget to think about your long-term goals and priorities. My partner-mentor helps me create and stick to my plan, while giving me practical advice and insight about how to reach my goals.'

What Makes Our Program Work

Allowing associates to have a say in picking their mentor. As noted above, Sutherland associates give us their three top preferences for a partner plan adviser. We do not guarantee that an associate will get one of his/her preferences (although most, if not all, do). However, allowing them to give their preferences not only assures that the associates are comfortable with that partner, but that the partner feels a sense of personal responsibility for the particular associate with whom he/she is matched.

Providing meeting topics and deadlines. Attorneys appreciate clear, concise directions and deadlines so they can use their time efficiently. We make it as simple as possible for our lawyers by providing topics, deadlines for meeting, reminders, clear examples of action items, and so forth. The less work required of the attorney, the more likely the program is to succeed.

Providing administrative oversight. We follow up with each pairing to ensure that they communicate on a quarterly basis. Busy schedules for both partners and associates can make it difficult to find a mutually convenient time to meet, but we have found that reminder e-mails and phone calls work.

Building support from firm leadership. Structure and oversight are key, but as always, it's a firm's culture that will play a large part in the success or failure of a mentoring program. At Sutherland, the emphasis on training and mentoring comes from the top, and the support of our managing partner, governing committee and all of the practice group leaders is unwavering. If partners are busy with billable work, the first thing that can get lost is the responsibility for training and providing feedback to younger lawyers. But if the importance of mentoring is truly conveyed to partners, they will consider it an integral part of their job.

Conclusion

Is a good program worth the effort? A quote from one of our associates best sums up the value of a mentoring program that works: 'The greatest benefit of our Career Planning Program is that it institutionalizes the mentoring process and makes you really think about your career and how you are progressing, as well as giving you the opportunity to discuss these issues on a regular basis with your partner adviser. Most large firms have something about mentoring on their Web sites, but I appreciate that Sutherland provides the structure and support it takes to make it work. They actually take the time to make sure that everyone is meeting. To me, that makes the difference between a program that works versus an empty promise.'


Kristy Weathers is a former practicing attorney and now serves
as Sutherland Asbill & Brennan's Director of Professional Development. Based in the firm's Atlanta office, she can be reached at [email protected].

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York Image

In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

The Cost of Making Partner Image

Making partner isn't cheap, and the cost is more than just the years of hard work and stress that associates put in as they reach for the brass ring.