Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Unfunded Retirement Plans: An Ongoing Problem

By Blane R. Prescott and William G. Johnston
July 30, 2007

During the past year, we witnessed a marked increase in the number of law firms, both large and small, which are finding that their existing unfunded retirement plans are becoming significant, disruptive forces. The underlying problem created by these plans is that the plans result in current income being diverted to former partners, thereby reducing the compensation of the remaining active partners. Today, the combination of an expected spike in retirements related to the baby boom generation and, for many firms, greatly increased benefit exposure due to sharp increases in firm profitability that is factored into the value of retiree benefits, stand ready to test the financial viability of even the strongest firms.

In our experience, a reduction of current income may be acceptable only as long as the amount of the current income being diverted is modest (i.e., a limitation of payments provision pegged at not more than 4%-5% of total distributable net income), and the amount of remaining distributable income to the partners is at a level they perceive to be generally competitive with the market. If, however, the firm begins losing partners to competitors and/or to retirement, and the existing partners perceive they are diverting disproportionate current income to such former partners, the viability of the firm is frequently undermined. As the amount of income being diverted to former partners exceeds this threshold, current partners are motivated to:

  • Assess whether the firm will survive long enough to pay them their retirement benefit, and if so, whether that benefit will be at a level they perceive to be fair given their historical sacrifices; and
  • Assess whether leaving the firm may increase their current income and provide a better guarantee of retirement income. For example, a partner may be able to join another firm laterally and receive greater current income (due to the lack of an unfunded retirement program). In addition, the partner may be eligible to receive payments for his/ her unfunded retirement benefit by leaving the firm early. As a result, current income would be maximized, and such income is under immediate control as opposed to being contingent upon the survival of the firm and the willingness of future partners to pay the benefit.

Over the years, many firms proactively attacked their unfunded plans to avoid the financial challenge that others now face. More often than not, firms that altered their retirement plans did so in response to specific strategic challenges, including:

  • A general concern about the firm's ability to fund the benefit when due;
  • An inability to retain talented lawyers who departed the firm due, in part, to unhappiness about being forced to subsidize the retirement of former partners;
  • Difficulty recruiting key laterals, many of whom left previous firms to get away from onerous unfunded retirement liabilities; and
  • An inability to grow via merger due to the reluctance of the potential merger partner to join a firm that was bringing to the table an unfunded obligation.

One of the most common hurdles in addressing unfunded programs is that partners ultimately must give up a benefit, and there is no alternate source of funds available from which to replace this benefit. For less senior partners, the lost benefit may be more than offset by increased current income over their remaining careers. However, for more senior partners who have already foregone historical income and may now face the prospect of losing future benefits, the termination of the program can prompt them to sue the firm for promised benefits or call for the dissolution of the firm in order to realize some value from the firm. For these reasons, resolution of such programs is among the most difficult operational issues law firms confront.

Potential Solutions

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York Image

In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?

The Benefits of Blockchain for e-Discovery and Data Preservation Image

As businesses across various industries increasingly adopt blockchain, it will become a critical source of discoverable electronically stored information. The potential benefits of blockchain for e-discovery and data preservation are substantial, making it an area of growing interest and importance.