Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Does Giving Tax Advice Make You a 'Preparer'?

By Richard H. Stieglitz and Michael G. Freel
August 30, 2007

Signed by President Bush on May 25, The Small Business and Work Opportunity Tax Act of 2007 ('Small Business Act') includes new preparer penalty provisions that range up to 50% of the fee for preparing the tax return. Lawyers who give tax advice need to know that this legislation had a 'surprise' in it regarding whom the IRS considers a tax return preparer.

The new law replaces the original Code definition of 'income tax preparer' with 'tax return preparer.' A tax return preparer now includes any person who prepares for compensation, or who employs one or more persons to prepare for compensation, all or a substantial portion of any tax return or any claim for refund. In other words, this standard no longer applies solely to those who prepare income tax returns ' it also now encompasses those who prepare estate and gift tax returns, employment tax returns, excise tax returns, and exempt organization returns.

Moreover, you do not need to actually prepare or sign a tax return in order to be a tax return preparer under the law. The regulations currently state that a preparer includes any person who gives a taxpayer or other preparer sufficient information and advice so that the completion of the return or claim for refund is largely a mechanical or clerical matter, even though that person does not actually place or review the placement of information on the return or claim for refund. A person who merely gives advice on specific issues of law is a preparer if: 1) the advice is given for events which have occurred at the time the advice is rendered and is not given with respect to the consequences of contemplated actions, and 2) the advice is directly relevant to the determination of the existence, characterization, or amount of an entry on a return or claim for refund.

Safe Harbor

In order to be a preparer, however, a person must 'prepare' all or a substantial portion of a return or claim for refund. The current regulations contain a safe harbor provision which states that a schedule, entry, or other portion of the return or claim for refund is not a substantial portion if the amounts of gross income, deduction, or amounts on the basis of which credits are determined are:

  • Less than $2000; or
  • Less than $100,000, and also less than 20% of the gross income (or adjusted gross income if the taxpayer is an individual) as shown on the return or claim for refund.

If this safe harbor is not met, the determination of whether a schedule, entry, or other portion of a return or claim for refund is a substantial portion is made by comparing the length and complexity of, and the tax liability or refund involved in, that portion with the return or claim for refund as a whole.


Richard H. Stieglitz is a tax partner, and Michael G. Freel is a tax manager in the New York accounting firm of Anchin, Block & Anchin, LLP, which specializes in providing accounting, tax, and consulting services to law firms. Stieglitz can be reached at 212-840-3456 or [email protected].

Signed by President Bush on May 25, The Small Business and Work Opportunity Tax Act of 2007 ('Small Business Act') includes new preparer penalty provisions that range up to 50% of the fee for preparing the tax return. Lawyers who give tax advice need to know that this legislation had a 'surprise' in it regarding whom the IRS considers a tax return preparer.

The new law replaces the original Code definition of 'income tax preparer' with 'tax return preparer.' A tax return preparer now includes any person who prepares for compensation, or who employs one or more persons to prepare for compensation, all or a substantial portion of any tax return or any claim for refund. In other words, this standard no longer applies solely to those who prepare income tax returns ' it also now encompasses those who prepare estate and gift tax returns, employment tax returns, excise tax returns, and exempt organization returns.

Moreover, you do not need to actually prepare or sign a tax return in order to be a tax return preparer under the law. The regulations currently state that a preparer includes any person who gives a taxpayer or other preparer sufficient information and advice so that the completion of the return or claim for refund is largely a mechanical or clerical matter, even though that person does not actually place or review the placement of information on the return or claim for refund. A person who merely gives advice on specific issues of law is a preparer if: 1) the advice is given for events which have occurred at the time the advice is rendered and is not given with respect to the consequences of contemplated actions, and 2) the advice is directly relevant to the determination of the existence, characterization, or amount of an entry on a return or claim for refund.

Safe Harbor

In order to be a preparer, however, a person must 'prepare' all or a substantial portion of a return or claim for refund. The current regulations contain a safe harbor provision which states that a schedule, entry, or other portion of the return or claim for refund is not a substantial portion if the amounts of gross income, deduction, or amounts on the basis of which credits are determined are:

  • Less than $2000; or
  • Less than $100,000, and also less than 20% of the gross income (or adjusted gross income if the taxpayer is an individual) as shown on the return or claim for refund.

If this safe harbor is not met, the determination of whether a schedule, entry, or other portion of a return or claim for refund is a substantial portion is made by comparing the length and complexity of, and the tax liability or refund involved in, that portion with the return or claim for refund as a whole.


Richard H. Stieglitz is a tax partner, and Michael G. Freel is a tax manager in the New York accounting firm of Anchin, Block & Anchin, LLP, which specializes in providing accounting, tax, and consulting services to law firms. Stieglitz can be reached at 212-840-3456 or [email protected].

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

'Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P.': A Tutorial On Contract Liability for Real Estate Purchasers Image

In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.