Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Editor's Note: This month we are privileged to have a guest columnist, Shannon Sankstone of Quarles & Brady. Shannon's article builds upon the presentation she will be making at the Competitive Intelligence for Law Firms Conference on April 8 with the American Conference Institute. The link to the conference is: www.americanconference.com/law_firm/CI.htm. Joshua Fruchter's column will appear in the May issue followed by Nancy Manzo's column in June.
Gathering intelligence on competitors, industries, and marketplaces is becoming increasingly popular in law firms. Intelligence is being used to support and guide business development efforts, while market research has long been a cornerstone of marketing. Yet, few firms evaluate the long-term growth of competitive intelligence (CI) in firm business development, and even fewer have sought to build systematically on current efforts to create an intelligence function that can predict opportunities. This article seeks to illustrate how a law firm can build a robust intelligence function ' gathering both competitive and business intelligence ' that will provide the greatest strategic benefit over the short and long terms.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.