Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Sharon Meit Abrahams, a member of this newsletter's Board of Editors, is one of the true leaders of law firm professional development. One of the pioneers in the early 1990s who helped launch this discipline for law firms, she was the first to hold such a position without a law degree. What she brought to the table was a deep background in adult learning theory, thanks to a doctorate in adult education, and experience gained from an early career in the corporate sector. With that, she has helped blaze a trail for the other law firm professional development personnel who have followed this career path.
Abrahams is currently Director of Professional Development at McDermott Will & Emery, LLP in Miami, and has served with the firm for eight years. Prior to that she was Director of Professional Development and Training at Greenberg Traurig for eight years. Before entering the legal sphere, Abrahams began her career in the corporate world, serving as a training manager for the largest bank in Florida, and subsequently in the health care and insurance sectors.
A prolific author, Abrahams has published many articles on the topic of professional and/or career development in the legal environment, as well as one book. She has also held three positions as an adjunct professor/instructor at three universities.
Program Success: Driven from the Top
When asked what makes a professional development program successful, Abrahams says it depends largely on the support received from top management.
“One hundred percent support from the top management is the only thing that will make a professional development program truly successful in all aspects,” she says. “Though individual programs can be excellent, only when a coordinated, comprehensive program is supported and driven from the top can there be true success.”
The Role of Marketing
Abrahams says that her job, every day, is about marketing, both within the firm and to external audiences.
“First, I market all day long. I have to sell, sell, sell the training to the attendees and to their supervising attorneys. I have to sell new training ideas to top management. I have to sell that our comprehensive training program is the reason why people should come to the firm and that it's a reason to stay at the firm.”
Abrahams also says her role is also to help the marketing department by providing programs that teach marketing to attorneys.
“We do tons of marketing training for all levels,” she says.
Abrahams also notes that marketing plays a significant role in promoting how the firm approaches training and professional development to potential recruits, clients and other key audiences.
“I market what we do through my publications and speaking engagements. I believe the more people know about the great training we offer the more people will want to join the firm and that clients will trust that our people are well trained and not always on their nickel.”
And Abrahams has some significant initiatives and programs to tout. She created McDermott University in 2004, and it serves as the firm's comprehensive training program. It covers core skills, aligned training, mentoring and career planning.
“Under this umbrella we also do many initiatives and learning institutes,” says Abrahams. “We also have three diversity committees ' gender, racial and ethnic, and LGBT.”
Other initiatives implemented at McDermott include a women's leadership training, women's business development, Harvard Business School leadership training, LGBT awareness training, the Advanced Litigation Training Institute, quick-start business development, and secondment programs (both internal and client).
Looking to the Future
As she considers where law firm professional development departments and programs will go in the future, Abrahams believes much will be gained from continuing to recruit those from outside the legal sector.
“I think as firms start to hire professional educators out of the corporate world, the quality of training will be improved. Lawyers really don't understand how to design curricula and how to put together a comprehensive integrated education program.”
Kevin Aschenbrenner is an Account Supervisor, Media Relations with Jaffe Associates, and Editor-in-Chief of the Jaffe Legal News Service. He can be reached at aschk@jaffeasso ciates.com or 250-294-8431.
Sharon Meit Abrahams, a member of this newsletter's Board of Editors, is one of the true leaders of law firm professional development. One of the pioneers in the early 1990s who helped launch this discipline for law firms, she was the first to hold such a position without a law degree. What she brought to the table was a deep background in adult learning theory, thanks to a doctorate in adult education, and experience gained from an early career in the corporate sector. With that, she has helped blaze a trail for the other law firm professional development personnel who have followed this career path.
Abrahams is currently Director of Professional Development at
A prolific author, Abrahams has published many articles on the topic of professional and/or career development in the legal environment, as well as one book. She has also held three positions as an adjunct professor/instructor at three universities.
Program Success: Driven from the Top
When asked what makes a professional development program successful, Abrahams says it depends largely on the support received from top management.
“One hundred percent support from the top management is the only thing that will make a professional development program truly successful in all aspects,” she says. “Though individual programs can be excellent, only when a coordinated, comprehensive program is supported and driven from the top can there be true success.”
The Role of Marketing
Abrahams says that her job, every day, is about marketing, both within the firm and to external audiences.
“First, I market all day long. I have to sell, sell, sell the training to the attendees and to their supervising attorneys. I have to sell new training ideas to top management. I have to sell that our comprehensive training program is the reason why people should come to the firm and that it's a reason to stay at the firm.”
Abrahams also says her role is also to help the marketing department by providing programs that teach marketing to attorneys.
“We do tons of marketing training for all levels,” she says.
Abrahams also notes that marketing plays a significant role in promoting how the firm approaches training and professional development to potential recruits, clients and other key audiences.
“I market what we do through my publications and speaking engagements. I believe the more people know about the great training we offer the more people will want to join the firm and that clients will trust that our people are well trained and not always on their nickel.”
And Abrahams has some significant initiatives and programs to tout. She created McDermott University in 2004, and it serves as the firm's comprehensive training program. It covers core skills, aligned training, mentoring and career planning.
“Under this umbrella we also do many initiatives and learning institutes,” says Abrahams. “We also have three diversity committees ' gender, racial and ethnic, and LGBT.”
Other initiatives implemented at McDermott include a women's leadership training, women's business development, Harvard Business School leadership training, LGBT awareness training, the Advanced Litigation Training Institute, quick-start business development, and secondment programs (both internal and client).
Looking to the Future
As she considers where law firm professional development departments and programs will go in the future, Abrahams believes much will be gained from continuing to recruit those from outside the legal sector.
“I think as firms start to hire professional educators out of the corporate world, the quality of training will be improved. Lawyers really don't understand how to design curricula and how to put together a comprehensive integrated education program.”
Kevin Aschenbrenner is an Account Supervisor, Media Relations with Jaffe Associates, and Editor-in-Chief of the Jaffe Legal News Service. He can be reached at aschk@jaffeasso ciates.com or 250-294-8431.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.