Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
If your firm is like most, much of the month of December seems to focus on compensation. If your firm's compensation system is a retrospective one, partners may be jockeying for their “fair” share of the pie for the current year. If the system is a prospective one, as is the case in my firm, all eyes are looking forward.
Whatever compensation system a firm uses, everyone should agree that the purpose of the system is to allocate the firm's profits equitably among the partners who have contributed to the generation of those profits. Whether that is achieved, of course, may be in the eye of the beholder. In any event, absent a system in which a single person or committee has absolute discretion as to how profits are to be allocated, a compensation system cannot be successful unless it has the confidence of all partners.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.