Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Okay, so you sent the prospect a letter. Or you had a great meeting. Or the prospect came to a seminar. And nothing happened.
You've learned the basic lesson. An initial contact, no matter how friendly, is not a marriage vow. The follow-up is necessary.
The fact is that in professional services marketing you've got a few distinctive things working.
These are basic realities for both large firms and small, which is why the follow-up was invented.
The idea is to keep in touch with the prospect ' to keep your name and service very much in the forefront of his or her mind without being counterproductive. How counterproductive? By being a nuisance. By calling too often. By pressing too hard. What does that leave?
Follow-up is also essential for the direct mail campaign. It doesn't matter that the letter said, 'if you're interested call me” You call anyway, and ask for an appointment to discuss his or her problems and how you can help solve them. Then after the first meeting, go to the above.
The idea of follow-up is to take the spark of an initial contact, and slowly ' carefully ' gently ' blow it into a flame. This means that whatever you do, it must be done with sensitivity. Insensitivity to your prospect's mood, reaction, time and schedule constraints, and personal likes and dislikes can turn an otherwise successful first meeting into a horrible disaster.
One key to it is timing. Not too often, not too infrequently. A letter should be followed by a phone call or an email within a week to ten days. Too soon is a nuisance. Longer than that there's no continuity or memory of the letter.
A person you meet at a seminar should be called the next day and invited to lunch, 'to continue the interesting conversation we were having yesterday.'
Articles, reprints, brochures should be sent out only when they are very relevant, and certainly no more than once a month, unless you have reason to do otherwise (you have a mutual interest in a very hot topic, for example).
There's an old joke about the guy whose wife was divorcing him after 20 years. When the judge asked why, she said: 'He never tells me that he loves me.' The guy's response was, 'I told her I loved her when I married her. It holds good until I revoke it.'
In marketing follow-up, as in real life, it doesn't work that way. You have to keep saying it.
Bruce W. Marcus is a Connecticut-based consultant in marketing and strategic planning for professional firms, the editor of THE MARCUS LETTER ON PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MARKETING, (www.marcusletter.com) and the co-author of CLIENT AT THE CORE (John Wiley & Sons, 2004). His e-mail address is [email protected]. ' Bruce W. Marcus. All rights reserved.
Okay, so you sent the prospect a letter. Or you had a great meeting. Or the prospect came to a seminar. And nothing happened.
You've learned the basic lesson. An initial contact, no matter how friendly, is not a marriage vow. The follow-up is necessary.
The fact is that in professional services marketing you've got a few distinctive things working.
These are basic realities for both large firms and small, which is why the follow-up was invented.
The idea is to keep in touch with the prospect ' to keep your name and service very much in the forefront of his or her mind without being counterproductive. How counterproductive? By being a nuisance. By calling too often. By pressing too hard. What does that leave?
Follow-up is also essential for the direct mail campaign. It doesn't matter that the letter said, 'if you're interested call me” You call anyway, and ask for an appointment to discuss his or her problems and how you can help solve them. Then after the first meeting, go to the above.
The idea of follow-up is to take the spark of an initial contact, and slowly ' carefully ' gently ' blow it into a flame. This means that whatever you do, it must be done with sensitivity. Insensitivity to your prospect's mood, reaction, time and schedule constraints, and personal likes and dislikes can turn an otherwise successful first meeting into a horrible disaster.
One key to it is timing. Not too often, not too infrequently. A letter should be followed by a phone call or an email within a week to ten days. Too soon is a nuisance. Longer than that there's no continuity or memory of the letter.
A person you meet at a seminar should be called the next day and invited to lunch, 'to continue the interesting conversation we were having yesterday.'
Articles, reprints, brochures should be sent out only when they are very relevant, and certainly no more than once a month, unless you have reason to do otherwise (you have a mutual interest in a very hot topic, for example).
There's an old joke about the guy whose wife was divorcing him after 20 years. When the judge asked why, she said: 'He never tells me that he loves me.' The guy's response was, 'I told her I loved her when I married her. It holds good until I revoke it.'
In marketing follow-up, as in real life, it doesn't work that way. You have to keep saying it.
Bruce W. Marcus is a Connecticut-based consultant in marketing and strategic planning for professional firms, the editor of THE MARCUS LETTER ON PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MARKETING, (www.marcusletter.com) and the co-author of CLIENT AT THE CORE (John Wiley & Sons, 2004). His e-mail address is [email protected]. ' Bruce W. Marcus. All rights reserved.
End of year collections are crucial for law firms because they allow them to maximize their revenue for the year, impacting profitability, partner distributions and bonus calculations by ensuring outstanding invoices are paid before the year closes, which is especially important for meeting financial targets and managing cash flow throughout the firm.
Law firms and companies in the professional services space must recognize that clients are conducting extensive online research before making contact. Prospective buyers are no longer waiting for meetings with partners or business development professionals to understand the firm's offerings. Instead, they are seeking out information on their own, and they want to do it quickly and efficiently.
Through a balanced approach that combines incentives with accountability, firms can navigate the complexities of returning to the office while maintaining productivity and morale.
The paradigm of legal administrative support within law firms has undergone a remarkable transformation over the last decade. But this begs the question: are the changes to administrative support successful, and do law firms feel they are sufficiently prepared to meet future business needs?
Counsel should include in its analysis of a case the taxability of the anticipated and sought after damages as the tax effect could be substantial.