Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Do You Give Samples?
Will You Settle For References?
Every so often, in a particular area of a professional practice, somebody gets the bright idea to give samples ' to give a half hour of free advice as a way to entice a prospective client to ask for more.
Two questions arise. Is it ethical? Is it good marketing?
The unqualified answer to both is ' it depends.
Lawyers and accountants give free advice all the time. They do it at seminars, in articles, in legal clinics, on television, on commuter train platforms, at dinner parties, and now, even online.
Is it ethical to give free advice in the hope of getting a client? Of course. Why else do professionals give so much free advice? (Except maybe to soothe one's own ego, or as a courtesy to a friend.)
How binding is free advice? Now there's the rub. If a lawyer or an accountant gives free advice that's bad, and gets the advisee into hot water, is the lawyer or the accountant liable? Not our station. We raise it just as a consideration and concern.
Is free advice (assuming a qualified source) worth more than the price of it? Of course. You don't pay for it.
Now for the other question ' is it a good marketing tool?
Yes, I think, if it's a gateway to advice that's really valuable. If it helps people understand why they really do need a professional ' a lawyer or an accountant ' to address the problem in question. If it's not superficial and the problem itself isn't trivial. If it helps define the magnitude of the problem and explain why further consultation is necessary (or maybe not necessary, which is also a service).
This implies, as well, that care is taken not to trivialize serious questions and problems by giving superficial answers.
It should also be realized that one simple action like this doesn't a marketing program make. It may get clients, but it doesn't shape a practice that conforms to the objectives that might be the vision of the partnership. It may get clients that are ephemeral, and give the firm a false security in numbers.
Building a sustaining and satisfying practice, on the other hand, requires a different kind of planning. And planning, for the professional firm of the next decade, begins not with the professional, but with the market.
And so the validity of a program of a free half hour depends upon what you want for the firm. If you want to get clients, this may get clients. If you want to build a practice, make sure the kind of clientele you get from this kind of activity builds the kind of practice you want. Getting clients isn't always the same thing as building a sustaining and satisfying practice.
Either way, do it with your eyes open ' knowing why you're doing it and what you mean to get out of it.
Bruce W. Marcus www.marcusletter.com [email protected]
Will You Settle For References?
Every so often, in a particular area of a professional practice, somebody gets the bright idea to give samples ' to give a half hour of free advice as a way to entice a prospective client to ask for more.
Two questions arise. Is it ethical? Is it good marketing?
The unqualified answer to both is ' it depends.
Lawyers and accountants give free advice all the time. They do it at seminars, in articles, in legal clinics, on television, on commuter train platforms, at dinner parties, and now, even online.
Is it ethical to give free advice in the hope of getting a client? Of course. Why else do professionals give so much free advice? (Except maybe to soothe one's own ego, or as a courtesy to a friend.)
How binding is free advice? Now there's the rub. If a lawyer or an accountant gives free advice that's bad, and gets the advisee into hot water, is the lawyer or the accountant liable? Not our station. We raise it just as a consideration and concern.
Is free advice (assuming a qualified source) worth more than the price of it? Of course. You don't pay for it.
Now for the other question ' is it a good marketing tool?
Yes, I think, if it's a gateway to advice that's really valuable. If it helps people understand why they really do need a professional ' a lawyer or an accountant ' to address the problem in question. If it's not superficial and the problem itself isn't trivial. If it helps define the magnitude of the problem and explain why further consultation is necessary (or maybe not necessary, which is also a service).
This implies, as well, that care is taken not to trivialize serious questions and problems by giving superficial answers.
It should also be realized that one simple action like this doesn't a marketing program make. It may get clients, but it doesn't shape a practice that conforms to the objectives that might be the vision of the partnership. It may get clients that are ephemeral, and give the firm a false security in numbers.
Building a sustaining and satisfying practice, on the other hand, requires a different kind of planning. And planning, for the professional firm of the next decade, begins not with the professional, but with the market.
And so the validity of a program of a free half hour depends upon what you want for the firm. If you want to get clients, this may get clients. If you want to build a practice, make sure the kind of clientele you get from this kind of activity builds the kind of practice you want. Getting clients isn't always the same thing as building a sustaining and satisfying practice.
Either way, do it with your eyes open ' knowing why you're doing it and what you mean to get out of it.
Bruce W. Marcus www.marcusletter.com [email protected]
Top 5 Strategies for Managing the End-of-Year Collections Frenzy
End of year collections are crucial for law firms because they allow them to maximize their revenue for the year, impacting profitability, partner distributions and bonus calculations by ensuring outstanding invoices are paid before the year closes, which is especially important for meeting financial targets and managing cash flow throughout the firm.
The Self-Service Buyer Is On the Rise
Law firms and companies in the professional services space must recognize that clients are conducting extensive online research before making contact. Prospective buyers are no longer waiting for meetings with partners or business development professionals to understand the firm's offerings. Instead, they are seeking out information on their own, and they want to do it quickly and efficiently.
Should Large Law Firms Penalize RTO Rebels or Explore Alternatives?
Through a balanced approach that combines incentives with accountability, firms can navigate the complexities of returning to the office while maintaining productivity and morale.
Sink or Swim: The Evolving State of Law Firm Administrative Support
The paradigm of legal administrative support within law firms has undergone a remarkable transformation over the last decade. But this begs the question: are the changes to administrative support successful, and do law firms feel they are sufficiently prepared to meet future business needs?
Tax Treatment of Judgments and Settlements
Counsel should include in its analysis of a case the taxability of the anticipated and sought after damages as the tax effect could be substantial.