Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Law firms face an ongoing challenge to reduce costs. Proactive firms can reduce their recurring costs for goods, equipment and services while maintaining quality and service levels by developing and implementing strategic sourcing programs. Strategic sourcing involves systematically examining spending as a whole and developing a holistic strategy to achieve greater savings than could be gained by “one off” cost-cutting measures. While strategic sourcing does not include payroll costs, enhancing the quality of non-payroll services will indirectly help payroll cost management.
The benefits of well-managed strategic sourcing can be substantial, positively impacting the bottom line and increasing competitive advantage. Huron Consulting Group's clients that engage in strategic sourcing have reduced their recurring costs 5%-15% within six months to a year, through addressing issues such as sourcing, demand management, consumption and contract compliance. For some large firms, these savings can add up to millions of dollars. Following are some commodity categories where significant, repeatable savings can be seen:
Because cost is part of the value chain, a firm's strategic sourcing program can also strengthen client relationships and marketing initiatives. Firms that can show clients they are taking active steps to control not only passed-through costs but also internal overhead costs, also demonstrate that they are efficiently run, cost-aware organizations. Value-driven corporate law departments appreciate firms with a similar respect for economy and efficiency.
Guiding Principles of Strategic Sourcing
Rather than addressing purchases on an ad hoc basis, strategic sourcing involves taking a comprehensive view of all aspects of procurement to achieve sustainable savings. The guiding principles and goals of a good strategic sourcing plan include:
Developing a Strategic Sourcing Plan
Several steps are needed to apply the principles of strategic sourcing: collecting and analyzing information regarding current spend, products and consumption; identifying target areas for improvement; developing a plan to select vendors and negotiate contracts; and implementing processes and systems for maintaining and auditing the resulting savings.
Collecting and Analyzing Information
Effective strategic sourcing is fact-based and data-driven. An important first step is to develop a clear understanding of the firm's actual consumption and demand of products and services. The most effective analyses are firm-wide, spanning all the firms' operations and locations.
Current accounts payable data and invoices are a preliminary source of information. Review of existing or historical contracts, price lists, written correspondence, network diagrams, etc., can also contribute useful information. Existing vendor relationships should come under scrutiny, not only as to cost, but also considering issues of quality, delivery and service. This information can be analyzed and balanced against an understanding of the firm's consumption drivers, such as number of locations, timing of planned recurring purchases, etc.
Identifying Target Areas
The value of a comprehensive, firm-wide analysis will be apparent as the firm identifies and prioritizes target areas. The results may be surprising. For example, there may be low-priced items or services with very high-volume consumption where the incremental effect of even a small reduction in unit price can be quite significant to the bottom line. By contrast, there may be areas whose costs appear significant at first glance but are actually relatively small when seen from the firm-wide perspective.
Vendor Selection
Once target product and vendor areas have been identified, the firm can begin to develop its sourcing strategy, focusing on vendor selection and contract negotiations. Short-term goals should be to achieve price reductions or lock in prices, create a simple purchasing administration structure, and set the stage for further value discussions.
Vendor selection can be based on a number of factors, including price, quality, service and historical contract compliance. Consolidating suppliers will give the firm leverage for the negotiation of price and other contract terms. Benchmarking data from other law firms and the marketplace can often be helpful in price negotiation. Many firms are utilizing creative contracting and aligning incentives in order to manage costs, including flat-fee agreements, discount-based pricing or tiered pricing structures.
Implementing a Sourcing Strategy
A systematic execution of the plan, along with the development of firm-wide procurement processes and systems, will ensure that cost savings are sustained in the long-term. Following are considerations in developing the firm-wide processes:
If the firm is sufficiently large or has sufficient purchasing volume, it may be advantageous to develop an internal procurement organization to optimize the procurement strategy. As a general rule, AmLaw 200 firms fit in this category, but smaller firms will also benefit from establishing a formal organization. The responsibilities of such an organization typically include vendor management, contract management, demand management, process management and related data management.
Managing and Maintaining The Strategic Sourcing Program
To sustain the resulting cost savings, the firm must ensure that its strategic sourcing/procurement program is dynamic. That means regularly reevaluating sourcing decisions and routinely monitoring compliance, as well as ensuring the existence of a history/knowledge base for ongoing operations. Firms that have established procurement policies and procedures will have the necessary tools to measure and manage ongoing strategic sourcing. Performance measurement standards or “scorecards” for vendors can provide a basis for evaluating and managing supplier relationships. Consistency in internal compliance throughout the firm's offices and departments will further support sustained savings.
Responsible firm administrators must continually seek ways to maximize a firm's profitability. Strategic sourcing is a proven method for reducing recurring, non-staff costs. When sustained over time, these savings can have a significant positive effect on a firm's bottom line, while also enabling the firm to demonstrate its value and cost consciousness, thereby increasing its competitive advantage.
Law firms face an ongoing challenge to reduce costs. Proactive firms can reduce their recurring costs for goods, equipment and services while maintaining quality and service levels by developing and implementing strategic sourcing programs. Strategic sourcing involves systematically examining spending as a whole and developing a holistic strategy to achieve greater savings than could be gained by “one off” cost-cutting measures. While strategic sourcing does not include payroll costs, enhancing the quality of non-payroll services will indirectly help payroll cost management.
The benefits of well-managed strategic sourcing can be substantial, positively impacting the bottom line and increasing competitive advantage.
Because cost is part of the value chain, a firm's strategic sourcing program can also strengthen client relationships and marketing initiatives. Firms that can show clients they are taking active steps to control not only passed-through costs but also internal overhead costs, also demonstrate that they are efficiently run, cost-aware organizations. Value-driven corporate law departments appreciate firms with a similar respect for economy and efficiency.
Guiding Principles of Strategic Sourcing
Rather than addressing purchases on an ad hoc basis, strategic sourcing involves taking a comprehensive view of all aspects of procurement to achieve sustainable savings. The guiding principles and goals of a good strategic sourcing plan include:
Developing a Strategic Sourcing Plan
Several steps are needed to apply the principles of strategic sourcing: collecting and analyzing information regarding current spend, products and consumption; identifying target areas for improvement; developing a plan to select vendors and negotiate contracts; and implementing processes and systems for maintaining and auditing the resulting savings.
Collecting and Analyzing Information
Effective strategic sourcing is fact-based and data-driven. An important first step is to develop a clear understanding of the firm's actual consumption and demand of products and services. The most effective analyses are firm-wide, spanning all the firms' operations and locations.
Current accounts payable data and invoices are a preliminary source of information. Review of existing or historical contracts, price lists, written correspondence, network diagrams, etc., can also contribute useful information. Existing vendor relationships should come under scrutiny, not only as to cost, but also considering issues of quality, delivery and service. This information can be analyzed and balanced against an understanding of the firm's consumption drivers, such as number of locations, timing of planned recurring purchases, etc.
Identifying
The value of a comprehensive, firm-wide analysis will be apparent as the firm identifies and prioritizes target areas. The results may be surprising. For example, there may be low-priced items or services with very high-volume consumption where the incremental effect of even a small reduction in unit price can be quite significant to the bottom line. By contrast, there may be areas whose costs appear significant at first glance but are actually relatively small when seen from the firm-wide perspective.
Vendor Selection
Once target product and vendor areas have been identified, the firm can begin to develop its sourcing strategy, focusing on vendor selection and contract negotiations. Short-term goals should be to achieve price reductions or lock in prices, create a simple purchasing administration structure, and set the stage for further value discussions.
Vendor selection can be based on a number of factors, including price, quality, service and historical contract compliance. Consolidating suppliers will give the firm leverage for the negotiation of price and other contract terms. Benchmarking data from other law firms and the marketplace can often be helpful in price negotiation. Many firms are utilizing creative contracting and aligning incentives in order to manage costs, including flat-fee agreements, discount-based pricing or tiered pricing structures.
Implementing a Sourcing Strategy
A systematic execution of the plan, along with the development of firm-wide procurement processes and systems, will ensure that cost savings are sustained in the long-term. Following are considerations in developing the firm-wide processes:
If the firm is sufficiently large or has sufficient purchasing volume, it may be advantageous to develop an internal procurement organization to optimize the procurement strategy. As a general rule, AmLaw 200 firms fit in this category, but smaller firms will also benefit from establishing a formal organization. The responsibilities of such an organization typically include vendor management, contract management, demand management, process management and related data management.
Managing and Maintaining The Strategic Sourcing Program
To sustain the resulting cost savings, the firm must ensure that its strategic sourcing/procurement program is dynamic. That means regularly reevaluating sourcing decisions and routinely monitoring compliance, as well as ensuring the existence of a history/knowledge base for ongoing operations. Firms that have established procurement policies and procedures will have the necessary tools to measure and manage ongoing strategic sourcing. Performance measurement standards or “scorecards” for vendors can provide a basis for evaluating and managing supplier relationships. Consistency in internal compliance throughout the firm's offices and departments will further support sustained savings.
Responsible firm administrators must continually seek ways to maximize a firm's profitability. Strategic sourcing is a proven method for reducing recurring, non-staff costs. When sustained over time, these savings can have a significant positive effect on a firm's bottom line, while also enabling the firm to demonstrate its value and cost consciousness, thereby increasing its competitive advantage.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?