Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Beware the 'Unworthy Client'

By Richard M. Zielinski
February 26, 2010

Times are hard all over and law firms are all under pressure to boost revenue. You may be tempted to lower your standards for client intake in difficult times. Resist the temptation. About a third of all claims against law firms ' and a much greater percentage of the very largest claims ' result from taking on “unworthy clients.”

What Is an Unworthy Client?

A good working definition is a client who is incompetent, dishonest or financially weak ' sometimes all three. Here is a typical scenario: The client convinces third parties, typically lenders or investors, to give him large sums of money. Ultimately, the money is lost. Sometimes the client disappears or gets indicted. The lenders/investors sue your law firm. Sometimes the client himself, or the receiver or trustee of a bankrupt client, sues the firm as well. Typically, plaintiffs in these cases are not claiming there was any classic “error or omission” in the firm's legal work. The claims typically include aiding and abetting the client's fraud, negligent business advice or liability arising out of some representation or opinion given to the third parties by the law firm on behalf of its client. The refrain I often hear in these cases is: Why did we ever get involved with this client in the first place?

Red Flags

These include: 1) Clients with a prior record of failed business ventures, bankruptcy or other litigation; 2) Clients who have recently switched lawyers, especially if prior counsel has not been fully paid; 3) Clients who are reluctant to sign Engagement Letters and pay appropriate retainers; and 4) Clients who simply have unreasonable goals and expectations.

How Do You Avoid This Problem?

The short answer is to have good new client intake procedures. Many firms now require second partner review or review of new clients by a “new business intake” committee. Here are a few other tips: 1) If your preliminary screening turns up any red flags, conduct a more generalized database search on the prospective client; 2) If the client is switching law firms, get permission to speak with prior counsel and do so. 3) Ask the hard questions; and 4) Apply a common-sense “smell test” to the new matter. In a litigation context, does the client appear to have a viable claim or defense, and one which justifies the actual and opportunity costs of litigating? Does the client appear to have the experience, sophistication and resources to achieve his stated goals? Does the client have reasonable expectations about the outcome of the case, or is he looking for “pie in the sky”?

How Can You Mitigate the Effects of an Unworthy Client?

If you decide, after careful consideration, to take on or continue representing a risky client, there are certain precautions you can take to minimize the firm's exposure:

Carefully limit the scope of your engagement ' in writing.

Get an appropriate retainer and keep it refreshed. Bill regularly and try not to let the client get behind on payment. Avoid giving the client business advice, or vouching for the client's character or solvency to third parties, such as lenders or investors

Conclusion

Follow these simple rules and, while you may not get richer in difficult times, you will become much wiser and possibly avoid a catastrophic claim against your law firm.


Richard Zielinski is a director in the litigation group of Goulston & Storrs. He is a general trial lawyer who frequently defends law firms in professional liability matters. Richard can be reached at [email protected].

Times are hard all over and law firms are all under pressure to boost revenue. You may be tempted to lower your standards for client intake in difficult times. Resist the temptation. About a third of all claims against law firms ' and a much greater percentage of the very largest claims ' result from taking on “unworthy clients.”

What Is an Unworthy Client?

A good working definition is a client who is incompetent, dishonest or financially weak ' sometimes all three. Here is a typical scenario: The client convinces third parties, typically lenders or investors, to give him large sums of money. Ultimately, the money is lost. Sometimes the client disappears or gets indicted. The lenders/investors sue your law firm. Sometimes the client himself, or the receiver or trustee of a bankrupt client, sues the firm as well. Typically, plaintiffs in these cases are not claiming there was any classic “error or omission” in the firm's legal work. The claims typically include aiding and abetting the client's fraud, negligent business advice or liability arising out of some representation or opinion given to the third parties by the law firm on behalf of its client. The refrain I often hear in these cases is: Why did we ever get involved with this client in the first place?

Red Flags

These include: 1) Clients with a prior record of failed business ventures, bankruptcy or other litigation; 2) Clients who have recently switched lawyers, especially if prior counsel has not been fully paid; 3) Clients who are reluctant to sign Engagement Letters and pay appropriate retainers; and 4) Clients who simply have unreasonable goals and expectations.

How Do You Avoid This Problem?

The short answer is to have good new client intake procedures. Many firms now require second partner review or review of new clients by a “new business intake” committee. Here are a few other tips: 1) If your preliminary screening turns up any red flags, conduct a more generalized database search on the prospective client; 2) If the client is switching law firms, get permission to speak with prior counsel and do so. 3) Ask the hard questions; and 4) Apply a common-sense “smell test” to the new matter. In a litigation context, does the client appear to have a viable claim or defense, and one which justifies the actual and opportunity costs of litigating? Does the client appear to have the experience, sophistication and resources to achieve his stated goals? Does the client have reasonable expectations about the outcome of the case, or is he looking for “pie in the sky”?

How Can You Mitigate the Effects of an Unworthy Client?

If you decide, after careful consideration, to take on or continue representing a risky client, there are certain precautions you can take to minimize the firm's exposure:

Carefully limit the scope of your engagement ' in writing.

Get an appropriate retainer and keep it refreshed. Bill regularly and try not to let the client get behind on payment. Avoid giving the client business advice, or vouching for the client's character or solvency to third parties, such as lenders or investors

Conclusion

Follow these simple rules and, while you may not get richer in difficult times, you will become much wiser and possibly avoid a catastrophic claim against your law firm.


Richard Zielinski is a director in the litigation group of Goulston & Storrs. He is a general trial lawyer who frequently defends law firms in professional liability matters. Richard can be reached at [email protected].

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

'Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P.': A Tutorial On Contract Liability for Real Estate Purchasers Image

In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

CoStar Wins Injunction for Breach-of-Contract Damages In CRE Database Access Lawsuit Image

Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.