Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
After most firms have faced two-plus years of pressure by clients to cut rates, the thought of increasing fees seems a distant memory to many. In today's tough economic conditions, few lawyers at any size firm likely are considering an increase in their fees. This is, of course, a matter of economics. The seller of any service must understand costs, set profit targets, and gauge market demand. The decision ultimately is a matter of the seller's choice ' and the market's reaction.
This reasoning applies to lawyers and law firms, as it does to any other kind of business entity. A lawyer in any given area of practice at any given firm can charge for services at an hourly rate, a flat fee, a contingency fee, or a mixture of these and other billing methods. Moreover, the amount of those charges can vary widely. The only requirement, according to Rule of Professional Conduct 1.5 (“The Code”), is that “a lawyer shall not make an agreement for, charge, or collect an unreasonable fee.” The Code defines “reasonableness” by such factors as:
What Is Reasonable?
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.