Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Much of the pressure for law firms to utilize alternative billing approaches comes from companies of all sizes that increasingly want to control their legal costs by appealing to the individuality of lawyers. That requires rewarding lawyers for having “skin in the game” ' a personal financial stake in the outcome of a matter through compensation that goes up when the results justify it. The risk for the lawyer is in not meeting the client's cost and business goals; the reward is in meeting them or even doing better than what was required.
Lawyers who bill using contingency fees are the classic example of this type of shared risk arrangement. If the client doesn't receive value, there is no charge; if the client does receive value, the lawyer's fee is based on a previously negotiated percentage. Contingency fees are particularly useful for the lawyer skilled in analyzing cases and accepting those with a high likelihood of success. But there are risks as well, summarized in the line used in some law firms' television advertising: “No fee unless we win.”
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.