Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In recent months, the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) has demonstrated what many view as a newly aggressive approach toward challenging agreements between businesses not to poach each other's employees. In particular, the DOJ has brought legal challenges targeting a number of significant employers in the high-tech sector for their agreements not to cold call each other's talent.
Not unlike the businesses targeted by the DOJ, law firms compete with one another in an increasingly fluid market for scarce associate legal talent. And it's not uncommon for firms to seek to prevent legal recruiters who place lawyers with them from simultaneously recruiting away the firm's lawyers for placement with competitors. Accordingly, while the recent enforcement efforts might be distinguished in some ways from the typical legal industry setting, law firms and their leaders would be well advised to keep in mind the DOJ's stance as reflected in its recent suits, the potential impact it may have on no poaching arrangements in the legal industry, and the questions that remain unanswered by the DOJ's recently proposed settlements.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.