Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In today's workplace, most organizations regularly obtain health-related information from employees and their health care providers. Pre-employment medical exams, fitness-for-duty exams, leaves of absence, requests for accommodations, wellness programs and receipt of doctors' notes are just several examples. Sometimes these include genetic information, such as family medical history ' even if no one asked for it. Organizations that obtain, use and/or disclose an applicant's or employee's genetic information may run afoul of Title II of the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 (“GINA”), which prohibits companies from using genetic information to make employment decisions. Your in-house counsel, therefore, have a duty to take affirmative steps to avoid liability under this law.
Time to Take Action
The final regulations around Title II of GINA went into effect earlier this year. Nevertheless, many companies have not taken steps to comply with its mandates. It's time to take action. In FY 2010, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) received 201 GINA charges, and that number is expected to rise dramatically. Moreover, as GINA charges make their way through administrative agencies and into the courts, organizations are likely to get hit with substantial verdicts.
What Is GINA?
GINA is a law aimed at protecting individuals from discrimination, harassment and retaliation because an employer or potential employer believes the individual has an increased risk of acquiring a medical condition sometime in the future. GINA became effective on Nov. 21, 2009. Final regulations clarifying employers' obligations under GINA went into effect on Jan. 10, 2011.
Is Your Organization Covered?
GINA applies to private employers with 15-plus employees. It also covers all federal and state government employers, employment agencies, labor organizations and joint labor-management training and apprenticeship programs.
What Damages Could Result from a Violation?
Aggrieved individuals may seek the same remedies under Title II of GINA that are available under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended. These remedies include injunctive and equitable relief (such as hiring, reinstatement, promotion and back pay), compensatory and punitive damages, and attorneys' fees and costs. Organizations also may be fined up to $100 for each separate offense of willfully failing to post a GINA notice in places where other employment notices are customarily posted.
What Constitutes 'Genetic Information'?
“Genetic Information,” as defined by GINA, is very broad. It includes: 1) an individual's family medical history; 2) the results of an individual's or family member's genetic tests; 3) the fact that an individual or an individual's family member sought or received genetic services; and 4) genetic information of a fetus carried by an individual or an individual's family member, or an embryo lawfully held by an individual or family member receiving assistive reproductive services.
Genetic tests include tests such as amniocentesis and carrier screening to determine risk for sickle cell anemia or cystic fibrosis. Not all medical tests, however, are covered by GINA. For instance, tests for drugs or alcohol, cholesterol and HIV are not considered genetic tests.
“Family members” also is broadly defined and encompasses many types of non-blood relationships. Under GINA, family members include all dependents of an individual as the result of marriage, birth, adoption or placement for adoption and all relatives of the individual or the individual's dependents, to the fourth-degree. Therefore, family members are everyone from children to great-great grandchildren, spouses, and parents, to great-great-grandparents, aunts, uncles, nephews, nieces, siblings and half-siblings, first cousins and first cousins, once removed.
What Is Prohibited?
GINA prohibits employers and potential employers from: 1) requesting, requiring or purchasing genetic information; 2) disclosing genetic information, except in very limited circumstances; 3) discriminating against applicants and employees based on genetic information; and 4) retaliating against applicants and employees who refuse to provide genetic information, who file a charge of discrimination claim, who participate in a GINA discrimination investigation or proceeding, or who otherwise oppose discrimination under GINA. In other words, do not ask for genetic information in most instances, and do not tell others about any genetic information that may lawfully come into your organization's possession.
What Is Permitted?
Employers may acquire genetic information without violating GINA in the following situations:
Avoiding Inadvertent Acquisition
In-house counsel should advise appropriate personnel to warn an employee's health care provider not to provide genetic information when the organization requests the employee's health-related information, to support, for example, a request for a reasonable accommodation or for sick leave. The warning may be in writing or it may be oral, if the organization typically does not make requests for health-related information in writing. GINA regulations contain sample warning language, which in-house counsel can advise their organizations to put into place. Provision of the warning provides a “safe harbor” protecting the organization from a GINA violation.
If no GINA-related warning is given and an organization inadvertently obtains genetic information, no GINA violation occurs if the request for health-related information was not made in a way that would likely result in the receipt of such information. For example, the EEOC states that if an employer requests a doctor's note to support an employee's absence due to the flu, the doctor's provision of an individual's family medical history taken as part of the employee's medical examination would not be considered a GINA violation. As a best practice, however, include a GINA-related warning whenever requesting medical information from, or about, an applicant or employee.
What About ADA Compliance?
Under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), employers may request medical information from applicants and employees in certain circumstances. GINA, however, prohibits employers from obtaining family medical history or conducting genetic tests of applicants once a job offer has been made, even if such history or tests are required of all post-offer job applicants.
In-house counsel should take several affirmative steps to ensure compliance. First, verify that any post-offer medical exams do not include acquisition of family medical history or genetic tests. Second, advise your organization to tell health care providers not to provide genetic information as part of any examination, history intake, etc., of an applicant or employee. This includes responses to requests for information regarding whether an employee or applicant is disabled, information supporting requests for a reasonable accommodation and information in connection with a fitness for duty examination. Third, if your organization learns that its company doctor or other health care provider over which it has some control is collecting genetic information, take measures to prevent this from happening in the future, such as not using the health care provider's services.
FMLA Administration
Employees requesting FMLA leave generally must provide some medical information to their employers. As GINA regulations require employers to provide warnings to health care providers when requesting employment-related medical information, in-house counsel should have their organizations provide a GINA-related warning in FMLA forms used for an employee's own serious health condition, as well as requests for a second or third medical opinion and return-to-work certifications.
While the EEOC has commented that no GINA-related warnings need to be attached to the Department of Labor's FMLA forms as they are not likely to elicit genetic information, the EEOC has not issued formal, written guidance on this point. Accordingly, the recommended approach at this time is to include a GINA-related warning as part of all FMLA forms used for the situations covered above.
Reducing the Risk of a Violation
Whether you are in-house counsel for an organization of 15 or 1500, it is critical to work with your company and HR to ensure that you have all the policies and procedures in place to avoid a genetic information breach. In line with the above, following is a checklist of what in-house counsel can do to ensure compliance with GINA.
Conclusion
By taking the above steps, you can help reduce your firm's exposure to GINA liability. This is imperative as non-compliance exposes organizations not only to potential lawsuits based solely on GINA violations, but also to additional claims in other lawsuits, particularly those alleging violations of the ADA and/or the FMLA.
This article first appeared in Law Firm Partnership & Benefits Report, a sister publication of this newsletter.
Debra S. Friedman is a member of the labor & employment practice group at Cozen O'Connor. She can be reached at [email protected] or 215-665-3719.
In today's workplace, most organizations regularly obtain health-related information from employees and their health care providers. Pre-employment medical exams, fitness-for-duty exams, leaves of absence, requests for accommodations, wellness programs and receipt of doctors' notes are just several examples. Sometimes these include genetic information, such as family medical history ' even if no one asked for it. Organizations that obtain, use and/or disclose an applicant's or employee's genetic information may run afoul of Title II of the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 (“GINA”), which prohibits companies from using genetic information to make employment decisions. Your in-house counsel, therefore, have a duty to take affirmative steps to avoid liability under this law.
Time to Take Action
The final regulations around Title II of GINA went into effect earlier this year. Nevertheless, many companies have not taken steps to comply with its mandates. It's time to take action. In FY 2010, the
What Is GINA?
GINA is a law aimed at protecting individuals from discrimination, harassment and retaliation because an employer or potential employer believes the individual has an increased risk of acquiring a medical condition sometime in the future. GINA became effective on Nov. 21, 2009. Final regulations clarifying employers' obligations under GINA went into effect on Jan. 10, 2011.
Is Your Organization Covered?
GINA applies to private employers with 15-plus employees. It also covers all federal and state government employers, employment agencies, labor organizations and joint labor-management training and apprenticeship programs.
What Damages Could Result from a Violation?
Aggrieved individuals may seek the same remedies under Title II of GINA that are available under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended. These remedies include injunctive and equitable relief (such as hiring, reinstatement, promotion and back pay), compensatory and punitive damages, and attorneys' fees and costs. Organizations also may be fined up to $100 for each separate offense of willfully failing to post a GINA notice in places where other employment notices are customarily posted.
What Constitutes 'Genetic Information'?
“Genetic Information,” as defined by GINA, is very broad. It includes: 1) an individual's family medical history; 2) the results of an individual's or family member's genetic tests; 3) the fact that an individual or an individual's family member sought or received genetic services; and 4) genetic information of a fetus carried by an individual or an individual's family member, or an embryo lawfully held by an individual or family member receiving assistive reproductive services.
Genetic tests include tests such as amniocentesis and carrier screening to determine risk for sickle cell anemia or cystic fibrosis. Not all medical tests, however, are covered by GINA. For instance, tests for drugs or alcohol, cholesterol and HIV are not considered genetic tests.
“Family members” also is broadly defined and encompasses many types of non-blood relationships. Under GINA, family members include all dependents of an individual as the result of marriage, birth, adoption or placement for adoption and all relatives of the individual or the individual's dependents, to the fourth-degree. Therefore, family members are everyone from children to great-great grandchildren, spouses, and parents, to great-great-grandparents, aunts, uncles, nephews, nieces, siblings and half-siblings, first cousins and first cousins, once removed.
What Is Prohibited?
GINA prohibits employers and potential employers from: 1) requesting, requiring or purchasing genetic information; 2) disclosing genetic information, except in very limited circumstances; 3) discriminating against applicants and employees based on genetic information; and 4) retaliating against applicants and employees who refuse to provide genetic information, who file a charge of discrimination claim, who participate in a GINA discrimination investigation or proceeding, or who otherwise oppose discrimination under GINA. In other words, do not ask for genetic information in most instances, and do not tell others about any genetic information that may lawfully come into your organization's possession.
What Is Permitted?
Employers may acquire genetic information without violating GINA in the following situations:
Avoiding Inadvertent Acquisition
In-house counsel should advise appropriate personnel to warn an employee's health care provider not to provide genetic information when the organization requests the employee's health-related information, to support, for example, a request for a reasonable accommodation or for sick leave. The warning may be in writing or it may be oral, if the organization typically does not make requests for health-related information in writing. GINA regulations contain sample warning language, which in-house counsel can advise their organizations to put into place. Provision of the warning provides a “safe harbor” protecting the organization from a GINA violation.
If no GINA-related warning is given and an organization inadvertently obtains genetic information, no GINA violation occurs if the request for health-related information was not made in a way that would likely result in the receipt of such information. For example, the EEOC states that if an employer requests a doctor's note to support an employee's absence due to the flu, the doctor's provision of an individual's family medical history taken as part of the employee's medical examination would not be considered a GINA violation. As a best practice, however, include a GINA-related warning whenever requesting medical information from, or about, an applicant or employee.
What About ADA Compliance?
Under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), employers may request medical information from applicants and employees in certain circumstances. GINA, however, prohibits employers from obtaining family medical history or conducting genetic tests of applicants once a job offer has been made, even if such history or tests are required of all post-offer job applicants.
In-house counsel should take several affirmative steps to ensure compliance. First, verify that any post-offer medical exams do not include acquisition of family medical history or genetic tests. Second, advise your organization to tell health care providers not to provide genetic information as part of any examination, history intake, etc., of an applicant or employee. This includes responses to requests for information regarding whether an employee or applicant is disabled, information supporting requests for a reasonable accommodation and information in connection with a fitness for duty examination. Third, if your organization learns that its company doctor or other health care provider over which it has some control is collecting genetic information, take measures to prevent this from happening in the future, such as not using the health care provider's services.
FMLA Administration
Employees requesting FMLA leave generally must provide some medical information to their employers. As GINA regulations require employers to provide warnings to health care providers when requesting employment-related medical information, in-house counsel should have their organizations provide a GINA-related warning in FMLA forms used for an employee's own serious health condition, as well as requests for a second or third medical opinion and return-to-work certifications.
While the EEOC has commented that no GINA-related warnings need to be attached to the Department of Labor's FMLA forms as they are not likely to elicit genetic information, the EEOC has not issued formal, written guidance on this point. Accordingly, the recommended approach at this time is to include a GINA-related warning as part of all FMLA forms used for the situations covered above.
Reducing the Risk of a Violation
Whether you are in-house counsel for an organization of 15 or 1500, it is critical to work with your company and HR to ensure that you have all the policies and procedures in place to avoid a genetic information breach. In line with the above, following is a checklist of what in-house counsel can do to ensure compliance with GINA.
Conclusion
By taking the above steps, you can help reduce your firm's exposure to GINA liability. This is imperative as non-compliance exposes organizations not only to potential lawsuits based solely on GINA violations, but also to additional claims in other lawsuits, particularly those alleging violations of the ADA and/or the FMLA.
This article first appeared in Law Firm Partnership & Benefits Report, a sister publication of this newsletter.
Debra S. Friedman is a member of the labor & employment practice group at
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.