Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The China Social Security Law (“The Law”), which took effect on July 1, 2011, introduced a national framework aiming to standardize and strengthen the social insurance scheme administered by local governments for Chinese and foreign individuals, as well as their employers in China.
On Sept. 6, 2011, the Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security (“MHRSS”) issued the final Provisional Measures for Foreigners Working in China regarding Participation in the Social Insurance Scheme (“The Provisional Measures”), which took effect on Oct. 15, 2011.
The key provisions of The Provisional Measures that affect U.S. law firms with a presence in China are summarized as follows:
Challenges in Local Rules
The Provisional Measures provide general guidance for foreigners participating in the Chinese Social Security scheme. The details of implementation ' such as contribution rates and base, administrative procedures, etc. ' are highly dependent upon local rules issued by local governments and their enforcement, which may vary greatly from city to city. Some local Social Security bureaus are still drafting their updated local rules.
Given that Article 97 of The Law indicates that foreigners should participate in the Chinese Social Security scheme from July 1, 2011 while the effective date of The Provisional Measures is Oct. 15, 2011, it remains to be seen whether or not backlog Social Security contributions for the period from July 1 to Oct. 14, 2011 must be made. This may eventually depend on local Social Security bureaus' interpretation of The Law and The Provisional Measures. For example, one local Social Security bureau in southern China has taken the view that foreigners should make contribution from July 1, 2011.
Financial Impacts to Employees and Employers
Table 1, below, is an illustration of the costs associated with making Social Security contributions for the foreign employees and their employers based on current contribution rates and the bases in Shanghai, Beijing and Guangzhou.
Since the great majority of foreigners are paid a monthly salary that exceeds the local salary ceilings, the additional employer's and employee's combined Social Security contribution cost would be around Renminbi (“RMB”) 5,600 per month for each foreign employee.
[IMGCAP(1)]
What Benefits Could Foreigners Enjoy?
While it is indicated that foreigners participating in the Chinese Social Security scheme should be entitled to benefits similar to those enjoyed by local Chinese, The Provisional Measures do not elaborate on how foreigners could apply for benefits other than a pension.
As a reference, qualified participants in Shanghai who retired in year 2010 could receive around RMB 2,000 per month as their retirement pension payout (about $313 USD). Although the amount will be increased on a yearly basis taking into consideration inflation, practically speaking this is not much of a benefit to foreigners. In addition, except for a pension, the benefits for making contributions to unemployment insurance, maternity insurance, work-related injury and medical insurance are not clear at this time. For example, local Chinese are not allowed to claim unemployment insurance under The Law if they have immigrated to another foreign country. Since foreigners who become unemployed would usually leave China once their work permit is canceled, they would similarly not be eligible to claim the unemployment insurance in this circumstance.
Protection Under Totalization Agreement
While China has only entered into Totalization Agreements with Germany and South Korea, a number of countries have started discussions with China on entering into Totalization Agreements since the draft Provisional Measures were released. It is expected that more Totalization Agreements will be concluded (plus Germany and South Korea may expand the categories of Social Security insurance under their Totalization Agreements with China) to relieve foreign individuals' Chinese Social Security obligations in the future. However, it is still unknown how local Social Security bureaus will enforce the exemption that is typically available under a Totalization Agreement. For example, one local Social Security bureau has indicated that both the employers and employees should first make the Social Security contributions, but any refund will be limited to the employees' contributions only.
Impacts on Residents of Taiwan, Hong Kong and Macau
The draft Provisional Measures indicated that Taiwan, Hong Kong and Macau (“THKM”) residents should make Social Security contributions as set forth in The Provisional Measures to follow. However, this clause was removed from The Provisional Measures issued on Sept. 6, 2011. Thus, the question exists whether THKM residents are “exempted” from making such contributions under The Provisional Measures or the local authority may continue to rely on the Labour and Social Security Bureau Order [2005] No. 26, which requires participation of THKM residents in the Chinese Social Security scheme if they are employed by a Chinese company in China. It is also possible that a separate guideline covering THKM residents may be issued by some local authorities down the line.
Law firms with offices in Hong Kong and/or Taiwan, in addition to those with a presence in China, must decide whether to participate in the program, or to take the chance and delay participation until some definitive clarification is issued.
Any Time Bar for Enforcing Backlog Contributions?
While it is not specified under The Law, the Implementation Rules for The Law and The Provisional Measures whether there is a time limit in which the relevant local authorities could require employers and the employees to make backlog contributions, it is stated in The Provisional Measures that in the case of non-registration and non-contribution, reference should be made to State Council Order [2004] No. 423 (“Circular 423″). According to Circular 423, there is a time bar of two years beyond which no further investigation may be conducted and no penalty would be imposed. However, it is uncertain that this interpretation will be accepted by the local Social Security bureaus and be in line with their updated local rules.
The Bottom Line: Effect on U.S. Law Firms
Law firms and their foreign attorneys working in China should ensure that they will be compliant with the latest local Social Security rules and practices to avoid noncompliance penalties.
Stanley Kolodziejczak, a member of this newsletter's Board of Editors, is co-chair of the Law Firm Services group of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP and has more than 25 years of business, tax and accounting experience. His current experience is working with law firms that are facing the challenges of growth in a changing global market. He can be reached at 646-471-3160 and [email protected]. Nancy Regan is a director in the Law Firm Services group of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP with 15 years of experience as an attorney in and around global law firms. She can be reached at 646-471-6104 and at [email protected].
The China Social Security Law (“The Law”), which took effect on July 1, 2011, introduced a national framework aiming to standardize and strengthen the social insurance scheme administered by local governments for Chinese and foreign individuals, as well as their employers in China.
On Sept. 6, 2011, the Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security (“MHRSS”) issued the final Provisional Measures for Foreigners Working in China regarding Participation in the Social Insurance Scheme (“The Provisional Measures”), which took effect on Oct. 15, 2011.
The key provisions of The Provisional Measures that affect U.S. law firms with a presence in China are summarized as follows:
Challenges in Local Rules
The Provisional Measures provide general guidance for foreigners participating in the Chinese Social Security scheme. The details of implementation ' such as contribution rates and base, administrative procedures, etc. ' are highly dependent upon local rules issued by local governments and their enforcement, which may vary greatly from city to city. Some local Social Security bureaus are still drafting their updated local rules.
Given that Article 97 of The Law indicates that foreigners should participate in the Chinese Social Security scheme from July 1, 2011 while the effective date of The Provisional Measures is Oct. 15, 2011, it remains to be seen whether or not backlog Social Security contributions for the period from July 1 to Oct. 14, 2011 must be made. This may eventually depend on local Social Security bureaus' interpretation of The Law and The Provisional Measures. For example, one local Social Security bureau in southern China has taken the view that foreigners should make contribution from July 1, 2011.
Financial Impacts to Employees and Employers
Table 1, below, is an illustration of the costs associated with making Social Security contributions for the foreign employees and their employers based on current contribution rates and the bases in Shanghai, Beijing and Guangzhou.
Since the great majority of foreigners are paid a monthly salary that exceeds the local salary ceilings, the additional employer's and employee's combined Social Security contribution cost would be around Renminbi (“RMB”) 5,600 per month for each foreign employee.
[IMGCAP(1)]
What Benefits Could Foreigners Enjoy?
While it is indicated that foreigners participating in the Chinese Social Security scheme should be entitled to benefits similar to those enjoyed by local Chinese, The Provisional Measures do not elaborate on how foreigners could apply for benefits other than a pension.
As a reference, qualified participants in Shanghai who retired in year 2010 could receive around RMB 2,000 per month as their retirement pension payout (about $313 USD). Although the amount will be increased on a yearly basis taking into consideration inflation, practically speaking this is not much of a benefit to foreigners. In addition, except for a pension, the benefits for making contributions to unemployment insurance, maternity insurance, work-related injury and medical insurance are not clear at this time. For example, local Chinese are not allowed to claim unemployment insurance under The Law if they have immigrated to another foreign country. Since foreigners who become unemployed would usually leave China once their work permit is canceled, they would similarly not be eligible to claim the unemployment insurance in this circumstance.
Protection Under Totalization Agreement
While China has only entered into Totalization Agreements with Germany and South Korea, a number of countries have started discussions with China on entering into Totalization Agreements since the draft Provisional Measures were released. It is expected that more Totalization Agreements will be concluded (plus Germany and South Korea may expand the categories of Social Security insurance under their Totalization Agreements with China) to relieve foreign individuals' Chinese Social Security obligations in the future. However, it is still unknown how local Social Security bureaus will enforce the exemption that is typically available under a Totalization Agreement. For example, one local Social Security bureau has indicated that both the employers and employees should first make the Social Security contributions, but any refund will be limited to the employees' contributions only.
Impacts on Residents of Taiwan, Hong Kong and Macau
The draft Provisional Measures indicated that Taiwan, Hong Kong and Macau (“THKM”) residents should make Social Security contributions as set forth in The Provisional Measures to follow. However, this clause was removed from The Provisional Measures issued on Sept. 6, 2011. Thus, the question exists whether THKM residents are “exempted” from making such contributions under The Provisional Measures or the local authority may continue to rely on the Labour and Social Security Bureau Order [2005] No. 26, which requires participation of THKM residents in the Chinese Social Security scheme if they are employed by a Chinese company in China. It is also possible that a separate guideline covering THKM residents may be issued by some local authorities down the line.
Law firms with offices in Hong Kong and/or Taiwan, in addition to those with a presence in China, must decide whether to participate in the program, or to take the chance and delay participation until some definitive clarification is issued.
Any Time Bar for Enforcing Backlog Contributions?
While it is not specified under The Law, the Implementation Rules for The Law and The Provisional Measures whether there is a time limit in which the relevant local authorities could require employers and the employees to make backlog contributions, it is stated in The Provisional Measures that in the case of non-registration and non-contribution, reference should be made to State Council Order [2004] No. 423 (“Circular 423″). According to Circular 423, there is a time bar of two years beyond which no further investigation may be conducted and no penalty would be imposed. However, it is uncertain that this interpretation will be accepted by the local Social Security bureaus and be in line with their updated local rules.
The Bottom Line: Effect on U.S. Law Firms
Law firms and their foreign attorneys working in China should ensure that they will be compliant with the latest local Social Security rules and practices to avoid noncompliance penalties.
Stanley Kolodziejczak, a member of this newsletter's Board of Editors, is co-chair of the Law Firm Services group of
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?