Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Emphasis Is On Competing
There are too many words we marketers use too easily, without thinking too hard about meaning or substance. One of my favorites is the most important word in marketing. It's competition. We use it all the time ' and then tend to ignore it as we go about the business of marketing.
Why, then, do we do all those seminars and blogs and websites and media releases? Certainly, not for their own sakes. Even the strategies we most often devise tend to lose sight of not just the word competition, but the act of it. Mechanical process performed, it would seem as if for its own sake.
It's been so long since Bates v. State Bar of Arizona, (U.S. Supreme Court, 1977) ' our declaration of independence from the shackles of traditions that prohibited any promotional activity or what we can now call frank marketing ' that we tend to forget what Bates actually did. It gave us the right to compete.
While it didn't say so in so many words, what it really said was: 'Now I can go after your clients and you can go after mine.'
What it said was: 'Now you can openly pursue a prospective client, in competition with other law firms. And you can use standard marketing tools, like advertising and press releases and selling to do it.'
There aren't many marketers today who are old enough to remember that, and I'm surprised at how many law firm marketers never even heard of Bates. But it was indeed our declaration of freedom from codes and canons of ethics that kept the professions immersed in a Dickensian past. They were rules that allowed lawyers to feel elite and exalted ' above the fray of commerce. Under the rubric of protecting the integrity of professionals, the ethical rules served to provide an aura of superiority.
It took several years ' and many debates and even lawsuits ' for the local bar to give in, but the ability to compete prevailed, and the skills to do so developed. And the interesting thing is that both the professions and the publics they serve are the better for it.
But the transition from the past to the future is not yet complete ' and won't be as long as we ignore the competition part of marketing and reside in just the mechanics.
What, exactly is competition?
It's pursuing business ' the prospective client ' even as other lawyers are pursuing the same clients. And at the same time, it's protecting your clients from being successfully wooed by other lawyers. It's not performed by mechanics ' the tools of marketing ' but by strategy.
So-called branding, which is really name recognition and a promise of performance, can be an irrelevant exercise. Unfortunately, the nature of the profession precludes many of the traditional marketing devices used by products to compete. You can't say: 'We do better briefs.' Never mind the ethical constraints ' the reality is that you can't prove it. Even with the best marketing campaigns, you're not likely to persuade a happily married couple to get a divorce. How then do you compete?
First, by understanding that your role is to serve a public, which you must take great pains to understand in every respect. In fact, there is rarely one general public. Is the public for labor law the same as the public for maritime law? Without understanding the market for your specialty, your skills, and your experience, any marketing you do is hobbled in a competitive environment.
Next, you have to think about your ability to serve each market in which you compete. In a dynamic and rapidly changing world, the nature of the prospective clientele is changing constantly. What made Steve Jobs so heroic was that he actually changed the nature of how commerce is performed. As important as his devices may be, more important was the way they altered the way business is done ' as did the whole Internet. If you don't read the trade press for your clients' industries, if you don't keep in constant touch with your markets' and your clients' business, you can't compete. If you don't follow industry and economic trends, you live a life of unprofitable surprises. These days, once dominant industries can be in decline, as emerging industries become dominant. And with surprising speed.
And finally, if you are a lawyer and not a trained or experienced marketer, you'd better understand that marketing is now an integral part of any practice. No more is marketing something done by a person down the hall. You are part of it. And if you can't do it, learn to understand both the process and the marketer. Remember at all times, in everything you do, you are competing for growth and success against a growing body of lawyers who are competing against you. If you want to survive, you have to learn to compete. It's an essential element for your professional world and your survival in it.
Emphasis Is On Competing
There are too many words we marketers use too easily, without thinking too hard about meaning or substance. One of my favorites is the most important word in marketing. It's competition. We use it all the time ' and then tend to ignore it as we go about the business of marketing.
Why, then, do we do all those seminars and blogs and websites and media releases? Certainly, not for their own sakes. Even the strategies we most often devise tend to lose sight of not just the word competition, but the act of it. Mechanical process performed, it would seem as if for its own sake.
It's been so long since Bates v. State Bar of Arizona, (U.S. Supreme Court, 1977) ' our declaration of independence from the shackles of traditions that prohibited any promotional activity or what we can now call frank marketing ' that we tend to forget what Bates actually did. It gave us the right to compete.
While it didn't say so in so many words, what it really said was: 'Now I can go after your clients and you can go after mine.'
What it said was: 'Now you can openly pursue a prospective client, in competition with other law firms. And you can use standard marketing tools, like advertising and press releases and selling to do it.'
There aren't many marketers today who are old enough to remember that, and I'm surprised at how many law firm marketers never even heard of Bates. But it was indeed our declaration of freedom from codes and canons of ethics that kept the professions immersed in a Dickensian past. They were rules that allowed lawyers to feel elite and exalted ' above the fray of commerce. Under the rubric of protecting the integrity of professionals, the ethical rules served to provide an aura of superiority.
It took several years ' and many debates and even lawsuits ' for the local bar to give in, but the ability to compete prevailed, and the skills to do so developed. And the interesting thing is that both the professions and the publics they serve are the better for it.
But the transition from the past to the future is not yet complete ' and won't be as long as we ignore the competition part of marketing and reside in just the mechanics.
What, exactly is competition?
It's pursuing business ' the prospective client ' even as other lawyers are pursuing the same clients. And at the same time, it's protecting your clients from being successfully wooed by other lawyers. It's not performed by mechanics ' the tools of marketing ' but by strategy.
So-called branding, which is really name recognition and a promise of performance, can be an irrelevant exercise. Unfortunately, the nature of the profession precludes many of the traditional marketing devices used by products to compete. You can't say: 'We do better briefs.' Never mind the ethical constraints ' the reality is that you can't prove it. Even with the best marketing campaigns, you're not likely to persuade a happily married couple to get a divorce. How then do you compete?
First, by understanding that your role is to serve a public, which you must take great pains to understand in every respect. In fact, there is rarely one general public. Is the public for labor law the same as the public for maritime law? Without understanding the market for your specialty, your skills, and your experience, any marketing you do is hobbled in a competitive environment.
Next, you have to think about your ability to serve each market in which you compete. In a dynamic and rapidly changing world, the nature of the prospective clientele is changing constantly. What made Steve Jobs so heroic was that he actually changed the nature of how commerce is performed. As important as his devices may be, more important was the way they altered the way business is done ' as did the whole Internet. If you don't read the trade press for your clients' industries, if you don't keep in constant touch with your markets' and your clients' business, you can't compete. If you don't follow industry and economic trends, you live a life of unprofitable surprises. These days, once dominant industries can be in decline, as emerging industries become dominant. And with surprising speed.
And finally, if you are a lawyer and not a trained or experienced marketer, you'd better understand that marketing is now an integral part of any practice. No more is marketing something done by a person down the hall. You are part of it. And if you can't do it, learn to understand both the process and the marketer. Remember at all times, in everything you do, you are competing for growth and success against a growing body of lawyers who are competing against you. If you want to survive, you have to learn to compete. It's an essential element for your professional world and your survival in it.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.