Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Rules governing lawyers with respect to client relationships, specifically advertising and solicitation, vary from state-to-state. The differences are many: from labeling communication, to filing and retention requirements, to the use of testimonials. The use of social media is governed by these rules as well, and lawyers and their marketing professionals need to pay close attention to how they should be applied in the case of blog posts, LinkedIn or Facebook profiles, Twitter feeds, and the like.
In this article, we take a look at LinkedIn profiles and point out areas of compliance concern. But first, let's review what the rules typically cover.
Four Key Areas
In general, advertising and solicitation rules governing lawyers cover four specific areas:
Again, each state has variations on these themes, so it is important to review the rules in the specific state(s) in which a lawyer is licensed to practice. Of note, the American Bar Association has a handy summary of the differences among state rules and the ABA Model rules of advertising, which is available online:
www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/migrated/cpr/professionalism/state_advertising.authcheckdam.pdf.
Getting back to LinkedIn, there are a number of areas that may pose problems with rule compliance.
Here are the highlights:
Specialties
Most states have limitations with respect to lawyers identifying practice specialties. Hence, the “Specialties” section of a LinkedIn profile is an area that needs special attention. The safest course of action is not to add content under the Specialties section so it won't appear on a profile. However, if a 100% complete LinkedIn profile is important, then use some qualifying language noting specialties of practice are not recognized in the state(s) in which an attorney is licensed to practice. It is permissible to go on to say that a lawyer's practice concentrates in certain areas, but just don't use derivations of “specialty” or “expertise” to describe experience.
Labeling
With respect to labeling LinkedIn profiles as advertising, this is less clear. Best practices would dictate that if the profile is more resume-oriented, i.e., just skeletal resume facts, then labeling is probably not required. However, if an attorney's LinkedIn profile contains language that proposes a commercial transaction, such as detailing the types of clients with whom the lawyer works or inviting contact by including phone or e-mail information on the profile, then the safe bet is to label the profile as advertising.
Connections
Lawyers need to be careful when using LinkedIn for introductions, particularly with respect to business development intentions, as this can violate solicitation rules. The best way to avoid unintended solicitations is to take note of how individuals want to be contacted, which can be found under the “Contact” heading of the person's profile. If you see that someone does not have any categories listed under “Contact,” this could very well mean that the person is not interested in connection requests or InMail contact. In this case, look for another point of introduction, usually through a second-degree connection.
Clients
What about clients in your network? There are a lot of advantages, the biggest being that you have access to your clients' LinkedIn contacts. However, connecting with clients opens the door to other individuals connecting with your clients through your network, and not necessarily with your knowledge. Many states have rules governing the disclosure of client names and other information, which can occur when importing client contacts into a network, or including recommendations on a profile.
Recommendations
Recommendations are very useful for enhancing a lawyer's credibility and credentials. However, they can also be considered testimonials, and a number of states bar or limit the use of testimonials by lawyers. Also of note, if you change your mind about offering them, LinkedIn does let you edit recommendations and you can withdraw a recommendation at any time without LinkedIn sending out a notification.
Groups
LinkedIn groups are very useful for obtaining perspective on an industry or issue, or identifying someone who has a particular expertise. Group discussions also give attorneys an opportunity to demonstrate knowledge on particular subject matter. However, be careful not to disclose what could be considered confidential information, or reveal client name information that can be protected under advertising rules. Remember that reporters can also be members of groups, and be following the conversation as background for a story. So take care with the questions you pose and the responses you give.
Conclusion
Bottom line, LinkedIn is a very useful networking and relationship-building tool, but take care to follow the rules governing lawyers.
Nancy Roberts Linder, a member of this newsletter's Board of Editors, is the Director of Marketing at Chapman and Cutler LLP in Chicago. She can be reached at [email protected].
Rules governing lawyers with respect to client relationships, specifically advertising and solicitation, vary from state-to-state. The differences are many: from labeling communication, to filing and retention requirements, to the use of testimonials. The use of social media is governed by these rules as well, and lawyers and their marketing professionals need to pay close attention to how they should be applied in the case of blog posts,
In this article, we take a look at
Four Key Areas
In general, advertising and solicitation rules governing lawyers cover four specific areas:
Again, each state has variations on these themes, so it is important to review the rules in the specific state(s) in which a lawyer is licensed to practice. Of note, the American Bar Association has a handy summary of the differences among state rules and the ABA Model rules of advertising, which is available online:
www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/migrated/cpr/professionalism/state_advertising.authcheckdam.pdf.
Getting back to
Here are the highlights:
Specialties
Most states have limitations with respect to lawyers identifying practice specialties. Hence, the “Specialties” section of a
Labeling
With respect to labeling
Connections
Lawyers need to be careful when using
Clients
What about clients in your network? There are a lot of advantages, the biggest being that you have access to your clients'
Recommendations
Recommendations are very useful for enhancing a lawyer's credibility and credentials. However, they can also be considered testimonials, and a number of states bar or limit the use of testimonials by lawyers. Also of note, if you change your mind about offering them,
Groups
Conclusion
Bottom line,
Nancy Roberts Linder, a member of this newsletter's Board of Editors, is the Director of Marketing at
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.