Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Marketing's Role in the Legal Industry's Pricing Revolution

By David R. Bowerman and Matthew J. Prinn
May 29, 2012

It's hard to imagine a more perfect opportunity for legal marketing professionals to earn a seat at the leadership table than the pricing revolution happening today in our industry. No longer a necessity of the latest recessionary period, alternative fee arrangements, or AFAs, are becoming increasingly more routine for businesses seeking to better manage their outside legal spend. The most progressive firms are developing sophisticated tools to help price AFAs, investing in legal project management training for lawyers, and analyzing the profitability of matters managed outside of the traditional billable hour.

While most firms take a collaborative approach in their strategic AFA development process by including members of finance, accounting, IT, and practice and office leadership, let us not forget that price is one of the “four P's of marketing.”

As law firms large and small develop AFA strategies, implement and measure results, it's imperative that the marketing department be an integral part of the process at all stages of the cycle. Done right, AFAs can be both highly profitable as well as a powerful competitive differentiator to the legal buyer. Below are a few areas where marketing can add significant value in the AFA process.

Educating Lawyers on AFA Structures, Terms and Formulas

Despite the fact that AFAs are expected to comprise 13.4% of all fees billed in 2012, according to a Citi Private Bank managing partner survey, many lawyers are still standing at the starting line when it comes to understanding these new pricing structures. Much of this confusion is due to the seemingly endless number of ways certain types of work can be managed, and how the shifting of risk can create value in the eyes of clients.

Marketing can alleviate this paralysis by helping define and aggregate details on common types of AFAs, and sharing this information at the outset of preparing a tailored fee agreement. These kinds of details might include:

  • A glossary of current AFA structures undertaken by your firm. This will allow lawyers to select from a base menu of different billing methods already in use and determine which method may best suit a particular client's goals.
  • Sample formulas for how the billing format works for each structure.
  • Budgeting templates to help lawyers draft and calculate an AFA.
  • An overview of your firm's process for reviewing and approving AFAs if different from the normal file opening process.
  • A list of “go-to” resources for additional follow-up, including members of the finance or accounting teams who specialize in AFA matters or partners who can be contacted for questions in specific legal areas.

Creating AFAs for New Business Pursuits

Many current and prospective clients are asking outside counsel to suggest innovative fees and provide different billing options for them to consider, whether through a formal RFP or an informal bid process. Occasionally, clients may have a particular arrangement in mind, but will often ask firms to make suggestions.

Lawyers who have spent their entire careers billing by the hour often need guidance as to what structure may work best for the opportunity at hand. This is a perfect opportunity for marketing professionals to assume a coaching role by suggesting possible AFA structures that fit the prospective matter and offer the best scenario for a mutually beneficial outcome.

For example, a lawyer may be struggling to provide a fixed fee for a prospective piece of legal work due to the work's uncertainty. Marketing might suggest the lawyer consider creating a hybrid AFA that would include a fixed fee for certain defined portions of a project and a blended rate for matters that fall outside the scope of work. Marketing should have knowledge of the different AFAs being offered across the firm and be able to provide guidance as to which models have been used most effectively in similar situations.

Selling Your Firm's Approach to AFAs

In today's economy, nearly all law firms are open to discussing AFAs with clients or prospects. But simply stating that your firm is “open” to discussing AFAs is no longer going to separate you from your peer firms, or provide you with a competitive advantage in the marketplace. Marketing should be working with firm leadership to devise a strategy to best leverage your firm's approach to AFAs.

Picture yourself in the role of a general counsel making a decision about which firm to choose for an engagement. Assuming the quality of legal work provided is roughly equal, what is it about the firm's approach and execution of AFAs that makes your firm the best choice? Is it because your lawyers have undergone rigorous legal project management training? Does your firm employ specialized budgeting or project management software? Is your firm using technology in a unique way to provide clients with regular project and budget updates? Does your firm manage a significant portion of its work through AFAs, which allows you a greater depth of resources for best practices? Your partners need to be able to sell your firm's approach to AFAs as a step above peer firms.

Identifying and Measuring AFA Performance

Once your firm has been selected to provide legal services under an AFA model, marketing's role in the process is far from over. Many firms have or are in the process of implementing systems to track the performance of AFAs to ensure that the costs of legal services provided are in alignment with the prescribed fee. For example, if your firm was selected to handle an M&A matter for a fixed fee of $1 million, tracking the actual realization cost to the firm during the engagement is imperative. This allows the firm to monitor the matter on an ongoing basis, to ensure the matter is being managed in a profitable manner and to make adjustments in real time.

Often working in collaboration with finance and/or IT, marketing can help define and create different types of profitability reports for firm leadership. The data produced should be arranged by practice or industry group, by office and by matter and AFA type. This allows for quick analysis as to which kinds of AFAs work best for different types of work, and which should be avoided, further improving the ability to advise lawyers early in the AFA development process. Summary reports by practice and office also provide practice and office leaders with broad intelligence on the progress of active AFAs under their jurisdiction, helping them identify matters that may be in jeopardy of profitability and to better manage their practices. This also allows management additional intelligence as to which partners are doing a better job of managing AFAs. Practice or office leadership is then able to consider this historical data when approving future AFA requests from individual partners.

Sharing Best Practices in AFA Project Management

The firms that are able to collect data from past experiences and use that intelligence to create more precise pricing structures for future projects will experience the most success with AFA pricing models. While a firm's billing system can collect information on profitability, additional details should be gathered by debriefing matter managers for an understanding of how work was allocated and performed.

Using the kinds of reports in the previous section, marketing can help identify the lawyers involved in leading successful AFAs and coordinate debrief sessions to collect and document any best practices that might be helpful for other lawyers undertaking similar work. Were special timelines created to ensure deadlines were met? Did finance provide regular reports on hours logged to lead lawyers? Did a project team meet on a frequent basis to decide the most efficient way to handle a particular piece of work? Marketing can also create opportunities for these lawyers to present case studies on their work to peers in the firm, further extending the sharing of best practices.

Time to Pull Up a Chair

The continued shift away from the billable hour by budget-conscious clients is profound, and by all accounts is expected to increase in the years ahead. Those firms that develop the tools and processes to effectively price and manage AFAs will be well positioned to win work from those that do not. This pricing revolution is a truly unique opportunity for marketing professionals to join firm leadership at the strategic decision-making table. There is no better time or place to pull up a chair, so don't wait any longer to get started.


David Bowerman is Director of Client Development and Matthew J. Prinn is an Associate Director for Business Development for K&L Gates, a global law firm with nearly 2,000 lawyers who practice in 41 offices across four continents. David can be reached at 206-370-6726 or [email protected], and Matt can be reached at 617-261-3143 or [email protected].

For Twitter, LinkedIn, Facebook and Google+ followers, click here to subscribe to Internet Law & Strategy at a special introductory rate of $329. This offer is valid for new subscribers only.

It's hard to imagine a more perfect opportunity for legal marketing professionals to earn a seat at the leadership table than the pricing revolution happening today in our industry. No longer a necessity of the latest recessionary period, alternative fee arrangements, or AFAs, are becoming increasingly more routine for businesses seeking to better manage their outside legal spend. The most progressive firms are developing sophisticated tools to help price AFAs, investing in legal project management training for lawyers, and analyzing the profitability of matters managed outside of the traditional billable hour.

While most firms take a collaborative approach in their strategic AFA development process by including members of finance, accounting, IT, and practice and office leadership, let us not forget that price is one of the “four P's of marketing.”

As law firms large and small develop AFA strategies, implement and measure results, it's imperative that the marketing department be an integral part of the process at all stages of the cycle. Done right, AFAs can be both highly profitable as well as a powerful competitive differentiator to the legal buyer. Below are a few areas where marketing can add significant value in the AFA process.

Educating Lawyers on AFA Structures, Terms and Formulas

Despite the fact that AFAs are expected to comprise 13.4% of all fees billed in 2012, according to a Citi Private Bank managing partner survey, many lawyers are still standing at the starting line when it comes to understanding these new pricing structures. Much of this confusion is due to the seemingly endless number of ways certain types of work can be managed, and how the shifting of risk can create value in the eyes of clients.

Marketing can alleviate this paralysis by helping define and aggregate details on common types of AFAs, and sharing this information at the outset of preparing a tailored fee agreement. These kinds of details might include:

  • A glossary of current AFA structures undertaken by your firm. This will allow lawyers to select from a base menu of different billing methods already in use and determine which method may best suit a particular client's goals.
  • Sample formulas for how the billing format works for each structure.
  • Budgeting templates to help lawyers draft and calculate an AFA.
  • An overview of your firm's process for reviewing and approving AFAs if different from the normal file opening process.
  • A list of “go-to” resources for additional follow-up, including members of the finance or accounting teams who specialize in AFA matters or partners who can be contacted for questions in specific legal areas.

Creating AFAs for New Business Pursuits

Many current and prospective clients are asking outside counsel to suggest innovative fees and provide different billing options for them to consider, whether through a formal RFP or an informal bid process. Occasionally, clients may have a particular arrangement in mind, but will often ask firms to make suggestions.

Lawyers who have spent their entire careers billing by the hour often need guidance as to what structure may work best for the opportunity at hand. This is a perfect opportunity for marketing professionals to assume a coaching role by suggesting possible AFA structures that fit the prospective matter and offer the best scenario for a mutually beneficial outcome.

For example, a lawyer may be struggling to provide a fixed fee for a prospective piece of legal work due to the work's uncertainty. Marketing might suggest the lawyer consider creating a hybrid AFA that would include a fixed fee for certain defined portions of a project and a blended rate for matters that fall outside the scope of work. Marketing should have knowledge of the different AFAs being offered across the firm and be able to provide guidance as to which models have been used most effectively in similar situations.

Selling Your Firm's Approach to AFAs

In today's economy, nearly all law firms are open to discussing AFAs with clients or prospects. But simply stating that your firm is “open” to discussing AFAs is no longer going to separate you from your peer firms, or provide you with a competitive advantage in the marketplace. Marketing should be working with firm leadership to devise a strategy to best leverage your firm's approach to AFAs.

Picture yourself in the role of a general counsel making a decision about which firm to choose for an engagement. Assuming the quality of legal work provided is roughly equal, what is it about the firm's approach and execution of AFAs that makes your firm the best choice? Is it because your lawyers have undergone rigorous legal project management training? Does your firm employ specialized budgeting or project management software? Is your firm using technology in a unique way to provide clients with regular project and budget updates? Does your firm manage a significant portion of its work through AFAs, which allows you a greater depth of resources for best practices? Your partners need to be able to sell your firm's approach to AFAs as a step above peer firms.

Identifying and Measuring AFA Performance

Once your firm has been selected to provide legal services under an AFA model, marketing's role in the process is far from over. Many firms have or are in the process of implementing systems to track the performance of AFAs to ensure that the costs of legal services provided are in alignment with the prescribed fee. For example, if your firm was selected to handle an M&A matter for a fixed fee of $1 million, tracking the actual realization cost to the firm during the engagement is imperative. This allows the firm to monitor the matter on an ongoing basis, to ensure the matter is being managed in a profitable manner and to make adjustments in real time.

Often working in collaboration with finance and/or IT, marketing can help define and create different types of profitability reports for firm leadership. The data produced should be arranged by practice or industry group, by office and by matter and AFA type. This allows for quick analysis as to which kinds of AFAs work best for different types of work, and which should be avoided, further improving the ability to advise lawyers early in the AFA development process. Summary reports by practice and office also provide practice and office leaders with broad intelligence on the progress of active AFAs under their jurisdiction, helping them identify matters that may be in jeopardy of profitability and to better manage their practices. This also allows management additional intelligence as to which partners are doing a better job of managing AFAs. Practice or office leadership is then able to consider this historical data when approving future AFA requests from individual partners.

Sharing Best Practices in AFA Project Management

The firms that are able to collect data from past experiences and use that intelligence to create more precise pricing structures for future projects will experience the most success with AFA pricing models. While a firm's billing system can collect information on profitability, additional details should be gathered by debriefing matter managers for an understanding of how work was allocated and performed.

Using the kinds of reports in the previous section, marketing can help identify the lawyers involved in leading successful AFAs and coordinate debrief sessions to collect and document any best practices that might be helpful for other lawyers undertaking similar work. Were special timelines created to ensure deadlines were met? Did finance provide regular reports on hours logged to lead lawyers? Did a project team meet on a frequent basis to decide the most efficient way to handle a particular piece of work? Marketing can also create opportunities for these lawyers to present case studies on their work to peers in the firm, further extending the sharing of best practices.

Time to Pull Up a Chair

The continued shift away from the billable hour by budget-conscious clients is profound, and by all accounts is expected to increase in the years ahead. Those firms that develop the tools and processes to effectively price and manage AFAs will be well positioned to win work from those that do not. This pricing revolution is a truly unique opportunity for marketing professionals to join firm leadership at the strategic decision-making table. There is no better time or place to pull up a chair, so don't wait any longer to get started.


David Bowerman is Director of Client Development and Matthew J. Prinn is an Associate Director for Business Development for K&L Gates, a global law firm with nearly 2,000 lawyers who practice in 41 offices across four continents. David can be reached at 206-370-6726 or [email protected], and Matt can be reached at 617-261-3143 or [email protected].

For Twitter, LinkedIn, Facebook and Google+ followers, click here to subscribe to Internet Law & Strategy at a special introductory rate of $329. This offer is valid for new subscribers only.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Legal Possession: What Does It Mean? Image

Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.

The Anti-Assignment Override Provisions Image

UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?