Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
There has always been a technology arms race underway in the legal industry. The participants include law firms of all sizes, corporate clients, judges, law schools and even the infrequent average consumer. Law firms in particular usually are a step behind the latest technological advances since they are reticent to impose sweeping changes on their risk-averse and preservationist lawyer populations. When advancements do occur, it is frequently a reaction to an outside request such as the ability to file documents with the court electronically, or clients requesting online access to their documents and bills in real time.
Most firms began in the late 1990s to make investments in technology platforms that allowed them to be more proactive about how they ran their businesses. These investments included document management, client relationship management (CRM), advanced financial systems and time capture software. The common thread was using technology to collect, index and retrieve mountains of data and share them with internal and external audiences. However, sharing is usually all that occurred. Lawyers and managers ruminated on data with genuine curiosity, but action was not the final result. This has begun to change since the legal industry crash in 2008-2009 though the ability and willingness to make hard decisions based on accumulated knowledge is still in its infancy.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.