Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Accounting and Financial Planning for Law FirmsLJN NewslettersNewsSections

Law Firm Turnarounds

By William F. Brennan
May 30, 2012

Dewey & LeBoeuf LLP, the 20th largest law firm in the country according to the 2012 NLJ 250, is in the process of dissolving with a future bankruptcy declaration almost certain. According to the firm's management, in 2011 it had more than $900 million in revenues with average profits per equity partner of about $1.8 million. The Am Law Daily reported that those statistics were substantially overstated and had to be restated to $782 million in revenue and $1.04 million in average profits per equity partner, still impressive statistics for a law firm. (Dewey says that the former numbers were and are accurate and are due to methodological differences.) How could such a prominent law firm end up in such a mess?

If Dewey's situation is consistent with other law firm financial crises, it fell victim to a series of different issues that individually might have been manageable, but together may prove to be insurmountable. Typically law firms in crisis face more than one of the following critical challenges:

  • Loss of key clients;
  • Loss of key partners;
  • Regulatory or legislative change affecting key practices;
  • Excessive reliance upon debt;
  • Overhead expenses out of control;
  • Overly rich benefits provided to former partners via an unfunded partner withdrawal entitlement;
  • Compensation systems not perceived as equitable or pay levels significantly below market;
  • Loss of confidence in firm Leadership/Management;
  • Inattention to client/practice concentrations;
  • Failure to react to market shifts;
  • Reliance on billing rate increases at twice the rate of inflation as primary means to increased profits.

The occurrence of one of these problems, if corrected quickly, is unlikely to cause a law firm to fail, but the simultaneous convergence of two or three, or an inability to adjust quickly, can spell doom for a law firm ' a business structure that relies primarily on the shared trust of its co-owners and thin capitalization.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Why So Many Great Lawyers Stink at Business Development and What Law Firms Are Doing About It Image

Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?

Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.

The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

A Lawyer's System for Active Reading Image

Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.

Protecting Innovation in the Cyber World from Patent Trolls Image

With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.