Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Accounting and Financial Planning for Law FirmsKickerFeaturesTopicsLaw Firm ManagementSectionsNewsLJN Newsletters

The Pathology of Failed Law Firms

By Stephen M. 'Pete' Peterson
June 25, 2012

As of this writing, Dewey & LeBoeuf LLP filed for bankruptcy protection on May 28, 2012 and is closing its doors. After trying to cheat death by running through an elixir of mergers, lateral hires, and guaranteed contracts, it was not able to sustain viability as an international law firm that once boasted more than 1,300 lawyers in 12 countries. It failed to consider the consequences of its growth, visions of Bali Ha'i, and incompatible cultures. Overstated financial results didn't help matters either. (Dewey says that its numbers, which were restated by The Am Law Daily, were and are accurate and are due to methodological differences.) From January through April, the firm has lost over one-third of its 300 partners amid a confluence of issues including a mounting debt crisis. As a last ditch effort Dewey tried and failed to find a merger partner. Most of the remaining partners left in May.

As of the filing date, Dewey's Statement of Assets and Liabilities revealed a negative net-worth of $52 million. This figure does not include “fee” accounts receivable (which rapidly declines in value after the filing); work-in-progress (that will need to be collected by the bankruptcy trustee from other law firms); or contingent liabilities (e.g., facility leases). One can easily see that the partners will be subject to clawbacks, and an experienced bankruptcy trustee will attempt to clawback partner distributions from not only 2011 but also 2010 and earlier years.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations Image

This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.

The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs Image

The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.

CLE Shouldn't Be the Only Mandatory Training for Attorneys Image

Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.

Discovery of Claim Construction and Infringement Analysis May be Compelled Prior to a Markman Hearing Image

A defendant in a patent infringement suit may, during discovery and prior to a <i>Markman</i> hearing, compel the plaintiff to produce claim charts, claim constructions, and element-by-element infringement analyses.