Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
As of Jan. 1, 2015, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA)” otherwise known as Obamacare ' begins to impose certain health coverage requirements on employers who have at least 50 employees. Even though its implications are almost a year away, it is not too soon for employers to prepare for the Employer Mandate. Employers would be wise to figure out if the mandate applies to them, understand the potential penalties that can be imposed on them and, taking into account all of the various considerations, decide if they want to pay or play.
What Is the Employer Mandate?
Beginning in 2015, the ACA will impose numerous obligations on employers who meet certain defined threshold requirements. Ultimately, if an employer is a covered entity under the mandate, it will have to provide the requisite health coverage to its employees or face financial penalties for failure to do so. In particular, if such an employer does not offer “affordable” health coverage that provides a “minimum” level of coverage to its full-time employees, the employer will be subject to a penalty if at least one of its full-time employees receives a subsidy for purchasing individual coverage on a state or federal health benefits exchange (referred to as the “exchange” or the “marketplace”). The circumstances presented to employers as to whether to provide the requisite coverage or subject themselves to the corresponding penalties has become known as the Pay or Play Mandate.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
As businesses across various industries increasingly adopt blockchain, it will become a critical source of discoverable electronically stored information. The potential benefits of blockchain for e-discovery and data preservation are substantial, making it an area of growing interest and importance.