Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The Death Benefit Only (DBO) Plan for Non-Profits is an arrangement in which the employer, a 501(c) non-profit organization, agrees to pay the actuarially determined cost of the current death benefit on a permanent life insurance policy to be owned by the employee or employer. The employer and employee enter into a written agreement that ordinarily requires the employer to make premium payments as long as the employee works for the employer. The employment agreement also requires the employee to execute a “co-ownership” or “restrictive endorsement” at the time the policy is purchased.
The co-ownership agreement would set forth the terms of the restrictive endorsement and the timing of its release. The employee will own the policy, the co-ownership agreement of the Plan will provide access to the policy by the employee, and the actuarial cost of the current death benefit will be deductible by the employer and not taxable to the employee. The economic benefit of the death benefit coverage will also be taxable to the employee. Any monies contributed by the employee or otherwise taxable to the employee will be a credit against the employee's economic benefit taxation. The Non-Profit executive bonus received by the employee is in the form of permanent life insurance owned by the employee. The life insurance policy can be continued after the employee's disability or retirement. The employee's named beneficiary may receive the life insurance proceeds income tax-free.
The cash value of a permanent life insurance policy grows on a tax-deferred basis. Because the Co-Ownership Agreement will lapse at, or prior to, the employee's retirement, the executive will have access to the policy's cash value during retirement. Withdrawals from the policy can be made on an income-tax free basis up to cost basis. Policy loans can also be taken without income tax consequences.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
As businesses across various industries increasingly adopt blockchain, it will become a critical source of discoverable electronically stored information. The potential benefits of blockchain for e-discovery and data preservation are substantial, making it an area of growing interest and importance.