Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The most important piece of legal marketing of 2014 was not legal marketing at all. Instead, it was a piece of journalism.
On June 23, HBO broadcast the television premiere of “The Case Against 8,” a behind-the-scenes look at the legal battle to overturn California's gay marriage ban. The film was not made to be a promotional tool for the lead attorneys on the winning side, Ted Olson and David Boies, but rather to report on a piece of history. It was not made by law firms or legal marketers, but rather documentary filmmakers. And yet, Mr. Olson and Mr. Boies could not have purchased better marketing if they tried. Each time the “The Case Against 8″ airs, millions of people invest in the story of the litigation, witness the appellate lawyers' involvement in the case, and come away with an enhanced appreciation for their work.
And that is the essential lesson behind corporate journalism: There is no more effective marketing for legal professionals than content that feels like traditional journalism. With corporate journalism getting more and more (deserved) attention, it's important for legal marketers to understand what it is, why it's important, and why it should have special appeal to those in the legal profession.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.