Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email GroupSales@alm.com to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Sales Speak: Closing Business: Four Stages of a Business Relationship
A number of scholars have studied relationship development and the science/psychology around building relationships. Whether the perspective is from a psychology viewpoint that uses tools like Myers Briggs and others; or from a business science viewpoint about various stages of relationship development, relationships matter and they take time to develop. Certainly, knowing one's style or preference is helpful, since that has an impact on others' styles and preferences. The relationship will either be a miss or a go. This article looks at a perspective on four stages of relationship-building, and provides some insight into each.
Just knowing people is not enough in today's competitive legal market. It may have worked 10 years ago, but not today. We often hear attorneys say, “She'll definitely call me if she ever has a legal need”; or, “I play golf with him every week, he will certainly call me if he needs help”; or, “I talk with this client a lot ' we have a number of active matters.” Assuming that a client or friend will know to pick up the phone and call you when a need arises is wishful thinking.
So what can one do to help drive the relationship from one step to another in the sales process? It is helpful to understand the current stage of your relationship with a contact. There are four basic stages, according to Robert Fisher, Associate Professor of Marketing, and the R.A. Barford Professor in Marketing Communications, at the Richard Ivey School of Business:
- Awareness. Meeting people; getting them interested in knowing you better and/or working with you. Establish common interests.
- Exploration. This is what shifts someone from being an acquaintance to a potential client. Stimulate with value propositions.
- Commitment. Does it make sense to do business together? Introduce unique differentiators and propose.
- Dissolution. A go/no go decision. Is this the right supplier/firm and is this the right client?
While much of Fisher's writing is related to consumer behaviors and the impact the Internet has had, the bridge to law firms and clients is fairly straightforward
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at customercare@alm.com or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?