Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Where does a CMO/CBDO belong on the law firm organizational chart? I ask this question frequently. Simply stated, my initial answer is, “It depends.” Organizational charts, in my opinion, should remain fluid, at least those used in professional services firms. Much of the staff alignment in an organizational chart is predicated on the particular styles, strengths, and weaknesses of its leadership, not on some universally accepted top-down box managerial arrangement. Despite this, I feel increasingly compelled in most cases to endorse alignment of the CMO/CBDO with the COO, not the Managing Partner.
Clearly, when the CMO function was in its nascent stage at law firms, perhaps 15 years ago, the question of reporting structure was asked because the role had never truly existed in many firms. Often, it seemed logical to tuck the position into the direct reporting line of an Executive Director/COO. After all, every other major central function including Finance, Information Technology, and Human Resources typically reported in a similar manner. Yet, as the role increased in size and scope, some CMOs insisted on reporting directly to the Managing Partner of the firm to ensure they had a seat at the already overpopulated “table,” whatever that is! I think that sentiment is a little short-sighted in today's big law firms, however. And here's why.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.