Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email GroupSales@alm.com to receive your discount on a new subscription.

The Tax Increase Prevention Act of 2014

By Richard H. Stieglitz and Nichol Chiarella
January 31, 2015

On Dec. 19, 2014, the President signed into law the long-awaited year-end tax package, the Tax Increase Prevention Act of 2014 (TIPA). This law extended to the end of 2014 many but not all of the individual, business, and energy provisions that expired at the end of 2013. In addition, the law provides for a new tax-advantaged savings program to aide in meeting the financial needs of disabled individuals, called the ” Achieving a Better Life Experience” (ABLE) program, as well as several other miscellaneous provisions.

Business Provisions Advantages of 2014

2014 remains a good year for law firms and their business clients to have made large fixed asset purchases or capital improvements. The additional first-year depreciation deduction (also known as bonus depreciation) is 50% of the adjusted basis of qualified property acquired and placed in service after Dec. 31, 2011 and before Jan. 1, 2015 (Jan. 1, 2016 for certain longer-lived and transportation property). The boosted expensing amounts under IRC Section 179 also remain through the 2014 tax year, which allow the firm/client to expense up to $500,000 for tangible personal property placed in service. This begins to become phased out once $2 million of qualifying property is placed in service, and becomes completely phased out when the cost of expensing eligible property exceeds $2,500,000. In addition, qualified leasehold improvement property can still be depreciated over 15 years for qualified leasehold improvements that were placed in service before Jan. 1, 2015.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at customercare@alm.com or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York Image

In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.