Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
LinkedIn has gained popularity as the social media tool for professional networking, and there are a few good reasons: You can maintain a decent page/site without spending a lot of time on updates; and clients and prospects view it as a legitimate tool for vetting referrals and service providers. According to a 2014 report by Hinge Research Institute, nearly 60% of in-house counsel vet attorneys via LinkedIn, which is nearly equal to the 63% who will “Google” attorneys (Beyond Referrals ' How Today's Buyers Check You Out, Hinge Research Institute, 2014). As of January 2014, almost 95% of ABA members said they posted their profiles on LinkedIn. That is great news, but how many are taking further steps to make the most of their profiles?
LinkedIn Self-Assessment
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.